2012
DOI: 10.1177/1078155212451196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of exposure of dispensary drug preparers to cyclophosphamide by passive sampling and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract: The anticancer drug monitoring methodology described here is a simple exposure assessment that can be used to ensure the safety of hospital pharmacy tablet preparers. Furthermore, since the anticancer drug exposure risk is very high for preparers, preparation should be in hood or with face mask.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Therefore, this method leads to safe preparation of the drug and minimum risk of drug exposure among health-care workers, patients, and their family members. The closed oral drug preparation device may be used in hospitals and in home care in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Therefore, this method leads to safe preparation of the drug and minimum risk of drug exposure among health-care workers, patients, and their family members. The closed oral drug preparation device may be used in hospitals and in home care in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wakui et al. 43 measured the amount of drug captured by a passive sampler at the mouth of workers crushing cyclophosphamide tablets with a mortar and pestle. Concentrations of cyclophosphamide ranged from 7.6 to 157.7 ng/sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the aforementioned search, 18 articles were categorized as analytical methods: 16 for surface contamination [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and two for air contamination [26,27]. The other two articles will not be further examined here as they refer to non-analytical methods for surface contamination assessment [28,29].…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They opted for NTD since it uses active sampling (while SPME requires passive sampling), which may contribute to higher precision, besides being user-friendly and fast [26]. On the other hand, Wakui et al decided to use a high-performance VOC-SD passive air sampler to overcome problems associated with active samplers, such as difficulty in equipment installation and sampling noise, and because they are easy to carry (which is relevant for personal sampling) [27]. Yet, both studies used carbon molecular sieves as adsorbents.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%