2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of estrogenic mycotoxins in environmental water samples by low-toxicity dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of an appropriate extraction solvent is of great importance in an LDS‐DLLME process. To obtain efficient extraction, the extraction solvent has to fulfill some requirements such as low density compared to water, low solubility in water, reproducibility, and good GC behavior . Many reports regarding DLLME have used chlorinated solvents such as dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, chlorobenzene, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of an appropriate extraction solvent is of great importance in an LDS‐DLLME process. To obtain efficient extraction, the extraction solvent has to fulfill some requirements such as low density compared to water, low solubility in water, reproducibility, and good GC behavior . Many reports regarding DLLME have used chlorinated solvents such as dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, chlorobenzene, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results revealed that extraction efficiencies of these solvents were comparable and higher than using the chlorinated solvents. Good sensitivity with relatively lower limit of detection was also obtained [22][23][24][25][26]. Compared to chlorinated solvents, some of the brominated and iodinated solvents have lower toxicity [22,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Since it was introduced by Rezaee et al . in 2006, various modifications of primary DLLME in recent decades have been reported, including ionic liquid‐based DLLME, low‐density solvent‐based DLLME, DLLME based on solidification of floating organic droplets, surfactant‐assisted DLLME, shaker‐assisted DLLME, vortex‐assisted DLLME, microwave‐assisted DLLME, ultrasound‐assisted DLLME, dual DLLME, and novel automated DLLME . The in situ derivatization is gaining more interest as sample preparation technique .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) is a rapid, economical and environmentally benign samplepretreatment technique being widely used in the analysis of EDCs in environmental matrices, food samples, and biological samples. [35][36][37] Since it was introduced by Rezaee et al in 2006, [38] various modifications of primary DLLME in recent decades have been reported, including ionic liquid-based DLLME, [39] low-density solvent-based DLLME, [40] DLLME based on solidification of floating organic droplets, surfactant-assisted DLLME, shaker-assisted DLLME, [41] vortex-assisted DLLME, microwave-assisted DLLME, ultrasound-assisted DLLME, [42,43] dual DLLME, [44,45] and novel automated DLLME. [45] The in situ derivatization is gaining more interest as sample preparation technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%