2000
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6017(200009)89:9<1097::aid-jps1>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Erythromycin and Related Substances in Enteric‐Coated Tablet Formulations by Reversed‐Phase Liquid Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Inspection of the erythromycin spectral region showed several additional signals. Accurate mass measurements were performed on all these peaks, and the follow- (Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Inspection of the erythromycin spectral region showed several additional signals. Accurate mass measurements were performed on all these peaks, and the follow- (Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same volume of fresh blank STF was added to maintain the uniform volume. The sample was filleted through a filter (0.45 µm), diluted and then injected (20 µL) into the HPLC column for the analysis using the previously developed HPLC method [ 34 ]. HPLC instrument (HPLC, Auto sampler, Shimadzu LC10AD, Kyoto, Japan) with C18 column, mobile phase system 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (60:40), a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min and detection at 254 nm was employed for the evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis, data acquisition, and reporting were performed using the Waters Empower 2.0 chromatography data software. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were 0.01 and 0.5 μg/L, respectively. , The established regression coefficient ( r 2 ) value was obtained as 0.999 for the working standard calibration curve. Analysis was replicated for statistical calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug is a potential contaminant in aquatic systems that needs to be removed using the established economic and efficient method . There are several factors affecting the removal efficiency of the drug from contaminated water such as (a) the components (water and oil phases) of the nanoemulsion, (b) the physicochemical properties (viscosity, globular size, ferrous ions, hydrogen peroxide, and refractive index) of the nanoemulsion, (c) the degree of polluted water, (d) method efficiency, and (e) other factors (pH, UV frequency, reducing agent, microbial inhibition by antibiotics). From the literature, it was concluded that the percent removal efficiency (%RE) of macrolides was comparatively lower than that of fluoroquinolones and the %RE values of ERN were 74 and 79% in wastewater treatment plants in Beijing and the United Kingdom (and Australia), respectively. , The drug can be estimated using previously reported methods based on the physicochemical nature of the drug. , The selection of excipients was based on various factors such as (a) the solubility of the drug, (b) the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) value of the excipient, (c) medium-chain triglycerides capable of self-emulsification after dispersion into water, (d) capability of forming an emulsion through self-emulsification into water and subsequent adsorption of the lipophilic drug, (e) safety and biocompatibility, and (f) cost-effectiveness and ease of access. Labrafil M 1944 CS (LabM) consists chemically of mono-, di-, and triglycerides and PEG-6 (MW 300) mono- and diesters of oleic acid (C18:1) (source: Gattefossé leaflet).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%