2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of eight quinolones in milk using immunoaffinity microextraction in a packed syringe and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antigen was synthesized using the glutaraldehyde method . In detail, 20 mg hapten was dissolved in 2 mL dimethylformamide and then 600 μL of glutaraldehyde, diluted ten times using PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4), was added dropwise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antigen was synthesized using the glutaraldehyde method . In detail, 20 mg hapten was dissolved in 2 mL dimethylformamide and then 600 μL of glutaraldehyde, diluted ten times using PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4), was added dropwise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEPS can be combined with LC to analyze different complex samples but in view of the technical facilities to use liquid samples the majority of works in the literature report samples such as beverages, waters, urine, blood, and plasma . Recently in the food field, this technique has been more used in the analysis of wines, milk, tea, juices, and others alcoholic beverages .…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of quinolones in milk samples was investigated by Zhang et al. that developed a selective and sensitive method applying an immunoaffinity sorbent (IA) in microextraction by packed sorbent with subsequent determination by HPLC‐FLD. A validation step was carried out reporting a linearity in the range of 0.1–100 ng/mL with LODs and LOQs between 0.05–0.10 and 0.15–0.3 ng/g, respectively.…”
Section: Applications Of On‐line and Off‐line Sample Preparation Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, even if MEPS is more easily automated than SPE, and more robust than solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [13], sorbent-based techniques and their different formats certainly represent a valid choice. These techniques provide simplicity in their operation, consume no solvent or minimize solvent usage, allow the separation and pre-concentration of the analytes using different commercial fibers, and the possibility of automating the entire process could be successfully applied in food, environmental, clinical, pharmaceutical and bioanalysis applications [14][15][16], as recently reviewed by Silva and co-workers [17].…”
Section: Sorbent-based Sorptive Microextraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%