1982
DOI: 10.1021/j100207a029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of dimerization constants of cis- and trans-configured secondary amides using near-infrared spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66,67 In contrast to hydrogen-bonding solvents such as dioxane and water, CCl 4 does not disrupt intermolecular amide-amide hydrogen bonding. [68][69][70] For neat Harmonic Frequencies ν j in cm -1 for N-H, CdO, and C-N NMA, a low-resolution IR spectrum is available in the Merck FT-IR atlas. Here one observes IR stretch frequencies for both hydrogen-bonded and terminal NH groups in neat, liquid NMA.…”
Section: Experimental Ir Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66,67 In contrast to hydrogen-bonding solvents such as dioxane and water, CCl 4 does not disrupt intermolecular amide-amide hydrogen bonding. [68][69][70] For neat Harmonic Frequencies ν j in cm -1 for N-H, CdO, and C-N NMA, a low-resolution IR spectrum is available in the Merck FT-IR atlas. Here one observes IR stretch frequencies for both hydrogen-bonded and terminal NH groups in neat, liquid NMA.…”
Section: Experimental Ir Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.5 kcal mol −1 per H-bond, large compared to cis-amides such as pyrrolidone or caprolactam, which show dimerization constants ranging 1–5 M −1 in CHCl 3 . [19] Along with phosphonamidates possessing both a stronger hydrogen bond acceptor (P=O vs. C=O) and a stronger hydrogen bond donor (P(O)N–H vs. C(O)N–H) than amides, the non-coplanar arrangement of donor/acceptor and lower directional preference of P=O donors allow the pseudo 6-membered ring to adopt a chair conformation and minimize repulsive secondary interactions (Figure 3b–c). [20] As a result, this dimer deviates from trends noted by Schneider and Sartorius, where each attractive interaction gives −1.88 kcal mol −1 of energy to ΔG, and each repulsive secondary interaction gives +0.74 kcal mol −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental infrared absorption or calorimetric measurements of the standard free energy of binding in chloroform are available for all six combinations of A, U, C, and G pairs (25,26,27,28). It is important to note that the two experimental techniques differ somewhat.…”
Section: Base Pair Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∆G°I R : mean of the cited IR absorption measurements (26,27,28). ∆G°c alor : calorimetric measurements (25).…”
Section: Table IImentioning
confidence: 99%