2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of cross-reactivity of poly- and monoclonal antibodies for synthetic cannabinoids by direct SPR and ELISA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the more specific field of snake antivenom antibodies, SPR has mainly been used for studying binding kinetics and affinity [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ], but could also be exploited for the study of antivenom cross-reactivity. Recently, a study by Langer et al [ 52 ], investigating the cross-reactivity of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for synthetic cannabinoids, demonstrated the potential of SPR as a valuable tool for this type of investigation due to the reduced amount of manual labor, the real-time analysis, and the high information content obtained about the binding interactions. Also, a newly published study by Choudhury et al [ 53 ] has revealed the development of a portable and inexpensive SPR measurement device with an integrated biosensor for detection of snake venom proteins, and illustrated the use of this device in the study of snake venom protein-antibody interactions.…”
Section: Traditional Studies Of Cross-reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the more specific field of snake antivenom antibodies, SPR has mainly been used for studying binding kinetics and affinity [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ], but could also be exploited for the study of antivenom cross-reactivity. Recently, a study by Langer et al [ 52 ], investigating the cross-reactivity of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for synthetic cannabinoids, demonstrated the potential of SPR as a valuable tool for this type of investigation due to the reduced amount of manual labor, the real-time analysis, and the high information content obtained about the binding interactions. Also, a newly published study by Choudhury et al [ 53 ] has revealed the development of a portable and inexpensive SPR measurement device with an integrated biosensor for detection of snake venom proteins, and illustrated the use of this device in the study of snake venom protein-antibody interactions.…”
Section: Traditional Studies Of Cross-reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed cross-reactivities of 6-AmHap-mAb to both 6-AmHap-Cy5 and morHap-Cy5 are not unexpected as these hapten-fluorophore tracers share similar structural faces, which is consistent with the “facial recognition” hypothesis. 38 , 39 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the first series of haptens was designed with an alkyl (hapten 1), phenyl (hapten 2), or naphthyl (hapten 3) at the head region. Studies have demonstrated the critical effects of linker position in how the hapten is approached by immune cells. , Thus, in addition to investigating the generation of broadly neutralizing antibodies, haptens 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 were modified at various regions to understand the effect of linker placement on hapten immunogenicity. In this regard, Class I drugs can be modified at three sites: 4′ naphthyl, 5′ indole, and tail terminal.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%