2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of consumer acceptance limits to sensory defects using survival analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Food quality control and assurance is evidently a top subject both in industry and in public control institutions (Juran, 1974;Herschdoerfer, 1986;Stauffer, 1988). A basic requirement of any sensory quality control (QC) system is the definition of standards or tolerance limits on a sensory basis for the product (Hough, Garitta and Sánchez, 2004).…”
Section: Why Investigate Quality?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food quality control and assurance is evidently a top subject both in industry and in public control institutions (Juran, 1974;Herschdoerfer, 1986;Stauffer, 1988). A basic requirement of any sensory quality control (QC) system is the definition of standards or tolerance limits on a sensory basis for the product (Hough, Garitta and Sánchez, 2004).…”
Section: Why Investigate Quality?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this regard, the methodology providing comprehensive information to determine shelf life using consumer data is based on survival analysis of food acceptability [17,18,25]. According to the industrial policy, the food company can choose more or less risk by selecting, as the acceptance limit, the proper percentage of consumers who reject the product.…”
Section: Identification Of the Acceptability Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an adopted rejection probability (usually 50%), the sensory shelf life of the product can thus be estimated. The methodology was then extended to estimating concentration limits of sensory defects (Hough et al 2004) and optimum concentrations of a food ingredient (Garitta et al 2006). In these studies, there was no "correct" result as consumers simply stated their acceptance or rejection for samples with different levels of the substance of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%