2020
DOI: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.4.306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Colistin Resistance by Simple Disk Diffusion Test Using Modified Mueller-Hinton Agar

Abstract: Background: Colistin has become a last-resort antibiotic for the management of multidrugresistant gram-negative bacteria. The disk diffusion test is cheap and easy to perform but may be unreliable for colistin susceptibility testing due to poor diffusion of the large colistin molecule. An improved agar diffusion test would increase the reliability of colistin susceptibility testing. This study aimed to modify Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) to improve colistin diffusion in agar.Methods: MHA was modified by reducing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The microdilution broth method, as well as the Etest, determine MIC values that can be used by clinicians to address antibiotic therapy options; whereas, the disk diffusion is a qualitative test based on a diameter of inhibition zone, which cannot be easily converted into a MIC value, but only allowing to describe bacteria as “drug susceptible”, “intermediate” and “drug resistant”. Although simple and performed in many laboratories, the disk diffusion assay presents some limitations including low reproducibility and inaccurate inhibition diameter determination [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The results from disk diffusion test performed for cefiderocol on our MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates, were not fully coherent with data obtained by using the “gold standard” broth dilution method due to the variability observed amongst technical replicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microdilution broth method, as well as the Etest, determine MIC values that can be used by clinicians to address antibiotic therapy options; whereas, the disk diffusion is a qualitative test based on a diameter of inhibition zone, which cannot be easily converted into a MIC value, but only allowing to describe bacteria as “drug susceptible”, “intermediate” and “drug resistant”. Although simple and performed in many laboratories, the disk diffusion assay presents some limitations including low reproducibility and inaccurate inhibition diameter determination [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The results from disk diffusion test performed for cefiderocol on our MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates, were not fully coherent with data obtained by using the “gold standard” broth dilution method due to the variability observed amongst technical replicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the Simple Disk diffusion method using modified muller-hinton agar as described by Uwizeyimana et al to test the susceptibility of all the multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (32/67) to colistin [ 34 ]. Briefly, an isolate suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and plated on modified Mueller–Hinton agar 30% (5.1 g/L) (Oxoid, United Kingdom), allowed to dry for 3–5 min, a 10 mg colistin disk was placed and incubated overnight at 35℃ in 5% CO2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The culture was incubated at the selected levels of temperature using WFT scienti c incubator. The bacterial metabolites produced in the growth media were extracted in methanol and subjected to analysis of their APA against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli in terms of zone of inhibition (ZOI) by the simple disk-diffusion method in Mueller Hinton agar (Uwizeyimana et al 2020). The Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CDC-54, PAO1) and Escherichia coli K12 (NCTC 10538) strains were obtained from the frozen stock (-80°C) of Biodiversity Collection Section (BDCS), Nuclear Institute of Agriculture and Biology (NIAB) Faisalabad, Pakistan.…”
Section: Anti-pathogenic Activity Of Bacterial Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%