1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)84784-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of catecholamines in urine by ion-exchange liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity 0.3 lUI/ml; inter-and intra-assay CV lower than 4.8% and 2.6%, respectively). Catecholamines were measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography for electrochemical detection (Eriksson et al 1983). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity 0.3 lUI/ml; inter-and intra-assay CV lower than 4.8% and 2.6%, respectively). Catecholamines were measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography for electrochemical detection (Eriksson et al 1983). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No: 68548, Espoo, Finland). A total of 24 h U NA/A was analysed with an electrochemical detection method according to Eriksson et al [16], and we used the quotient of norepinephrine and epinephrine, as it reflects catecholaminergic metabolism.…”
Section: Analyses Of Biochemical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased activity in sympathetic nerves is reflected by increases in NE (Udenfriend & Dairman, 1971) and general activation of the sympathetic nervous system initiates changes in EPI (Nesse, Cameron, Curtis, McCann, & Huber-Smith, 1984). The contribution of the NE nerve activity leads to baseline levels comparable to those of adrenally released EPI mirrors the relative levels humans (Eriksson, Gustafsson, & Persson, 1983). The consistent DA over these time points, along with the consistent creatinine levels, suggests that the increases in NE and EPI are not due to an increase in kidney function or production of urine (McDonald, Goldberg, McNay, & Tuttle, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%