2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01215-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of catecholamines and their metabolites in human plasma using liquid chromatography with coulometric multi-electrode cell-design detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the other methods which use SPE procedures [14,17], this method has the advantage of giving better extraction yields [14] and being more rapid and feasible [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared to the other methods which use SPE procedures [14,17], this method has the advantage of giving better extraction yields [14] and being more rapid and feasible [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method had distinct advantages over other extraction procedures, such as those using activated alumina [2,19 -20], or liquid-liquid extraction [21,22], due to its high extraction yield and precision. In the last few years, other authors have proposed SPE procedures with reversed-phase sorbents and diphenylborate complexation [14] or with cationic exchange sorbents [17]; in the latter case, however, a 35-times dilution is carried out to elute the sample, thus a subsequent derivatisation is needed in order to obtain a sufficient sensitivity for the analysis of CAs in human plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear range was 0.5-5000 pg with r > 0.999 (Takeda et al, 1990). A solid-phase extraction method combined with liquid chromatography with coulometric multi-electrode detection improved the detection limit to 0.01-0.05 ng/L, and nine catecholamine-related compounds were separated within 40 min (Unceta et al, 2001).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This method is based on the creation of diasteroisomers from DCIT and DDCIT (−)-(R) and (+)-(S) enantiomers and their subsequent chromatographic separation using normal-phase chromatography. In addition, owing to the fact that SPE involves multiple steps and it could be labour-intensive and time-consuming (Unceta et al, 2001), a new and simple liquid-liquid extraction procedure has been improved for the isolation of rac-DCIT and rac-DDCIT from plasma and brain tissue samples. HPLC-grade solvents tetrahydrofuran, chloroform, isooctane, hexane and isopropanol were purchased from Scharlab (Barcelona, Spain).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%