2014
DOI: 10.1002/eco.1482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of canopy‐shadow‐affected area in sparse steppes and its effects on evaporation and evapotranspiration

Abstract: Soil evaporation (E) and plant transpiration (T) dominate the water budget of semi‐arid sparse steppe, and they are crucial for vegetation restoration, as shadows cast by sparse vegetation may shade the sunlight and thereby reduce near‐ground radiation – which could affect biotic process of plants and land‐atmosphere flux transport dominated by E and evapotranspiration (ET). Currently, there are few studies on the effects of shadow on E and ET in semi‐arid sparse steppe because of the lack of appropriate resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morong. The greater water limitation for the seedlings in full sun can be explained by the greater evapotranspiration than occurs under shaded conditions, with interception of the solar radiation and a reduction in the energy available for evapotranspiration (Feng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morong. The greater water limitation for the seedlings in full sun can be explained by the greater evapotranspiration than occurs under shaded conditions, with interception of the solar radiation and a reduction in the energy available for evapotranspiration (Feng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, even though surface VSWC in shrubland was highest in this study, it did not significantly differ from that in the forest. This was likely due to sparser grassland canopy allowing increased radiation levels to enhance soil evaporation, and to promote photosynthesis and the growth of grass, all of which can accelerate the depletion of soil moisture (Feng, Qiu, & Zhang, 2014;Raz-Yaseef, Rotenberg, & Yakir, 2010). In addition, although canopy interception in shrubland was about 2% higher than that of forest (mean of 37.0% (Ma et al, 2017) and 35.1% (He et al, 2014), respectively), the closed shrub canopy may benefit soil water retention resulting in higher VSWC in shrubland.…”
Section: Soil Water Relations Between Adjacent Vegetation Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally both germination rate and germination proportion decrease progressively with decreasing soil water potential (Bradford 1990). As ambient temperatures increase, so does evaporation and evapotranspiration (Feng et al 2014), and the temporal period of moisture availability is decreased (Wang et al 2012). Seeds that germinate when moisture is available for short periods face the risk of emerging during conditions unfavourable for seedling establishment (Gremer and Venable 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%