2011
DOI: 10.1002/apj.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of bubble size distribution in a bubble column reactor using artificial neural network

Abstract: In the present study, bubble size distribution (BSD) within a bubble column reactor was modeled using an artificial neural network (ANN). The fluids tested in the bubble column consisted of 11 different oil mixtures, each containing two different oils. Pure water was also tested. BSD was determined for various superficial gas velocities by photographing the state of the fluid. It was found that bubble size as well as distribution depended on parameters, such as gas flow rate, liquid properties, sparger pore di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amiri et al used gas velocity, kinematic viscosity, density, and height as the input parameters to the artificial neural network model to predict bubble size distribution. Similarly, Amiri et al developed a neural network model to predict gas hold-up with the same input parameters as Amiri et al Chidambaram et al studied the trajectory of a bubble by integrating a neural network with image processing technology, and superficial fluid velocities, time, and nozzle diameter were the input parameters. Manjrekar and Dudukovic combined optical probe data with support vector machines to identify the flow regime.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amiri et al used gas velocity, kinematic viscosity, density, and height as the input parameters to the artificial neural network model to predict bubble size distribution. Similarly, Amiri et al developed a neural network model to predict gas hold-up with the same input parameters as Amiri et al Chidambaram et al studied the trajectory of a bubble by integrating a neural network with image processing technology, and superficial fluid velocities, time, and nozzle diameter were the input parameters. Manjrekar and Dudukovic combined optical probe data with support vector machines to identify the flow regime.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters were studied using genetic-support vector regression to predict the volumetric mass transfer coefficient, overall gas hold-up, and effective interfacial area. Amiri et al 44 used gas velocity, kinematic viscosity, density, and height as the input parameters to the artificial neural network model to predict bubble size distribution. Similarly, Amiri et al 45 developed a neural network model to predict gas hold-up with the same input parameters as Amiri et al 44 Chidambaram et al 46 studied the trajectory of a bubble by integrating a neural network with image processing technology, and superficial fluid velocities, time, and nozzle diameter were the input parameters.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%