2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of blood loss in bimaxillary surgery: does the formula and the time point affect results?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is thought to be due in part to bleeding into tissue spaces, such as the maxillary sinuses, which is therefore not accounted for [6]. Regarding the perioperative blood loss, the formula used to calculate blood loss in conjunction with the timepoint chosen has been shown to strongly influence the bleeding volumes determined [57]. While we acknowledge these potential shortcomings, it has previously been shown by our group that the formula applied does not significantly alter results, when measuring blood loss 48 h after surgery, where normalised blood levels are to be assumed.…”
Section: Gender-related Differences In the Haemostatic Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is thought to be due in part to bleeding into tissue spaces, such as the maxillary sinuses, which is therefore not accounted for [6]. Regarding the perioperative blood loss, the formula used to calculate blood loss in conjunction with the timepoint chosen has been shown to strongly influence the bleeding volumes determined [57]. While we acknowledge these potential shortcomings, it has previously been shown by our group that the formula applied does not significantly alter results, when measuring blood loss 48 h after surgery, where normalised blood levels are to be assumed.…”
Section: Gender-related Differences In the Haemostatic Profilementioning
confidence: 99%