2002
DOI: 10.1080/713714611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Atrazine in Vegetable Samples Using a Dipstick Immunoassay Format

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear decrease in maximum signal and sensitivity was observed. Similar results of the influence of organic solvent on the performance of ELISA have been reported in the literature [23,24]. Therefore, 2% of solvent, which corresponds to 1:25 dilution (1:50 in the well) of extract, was the maximum solvent concentration tolerated by this ELISA.…”
Section: Study Of the Extraction Processsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A clear decrease in maximum signal and sensitivity was observed. Similar results of the influence of organic solvent on the performance of ELISA have been reported in the literature [23,24]. Therefore, 2% of solvent, which corresponds to 1:25 dilution (1:50 in the well) of extract, was the maximum solvent concentration tolerated by this ELISA.…”
Section: Study Of the Extraction Processsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Dipstick immunoassays usually follow the standard ELISA procedure but use a membrane as antibody-coating support and rely on color development as seen with the naked eye. Their use as a diagnostic tool for detecting pesticides is becoming more common ( ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoassays can meet these requirements. Numerous related methods for the detection of atrazine have been reported, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [10][11][12][13][14][15], colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic (ICG) strip assay [16][17][18], time-resolved fluorescent immunoassay (TRFIA) [19] and liposome immune lysis assay (LILA) [20]. The specific features of each study are listed and compared in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%