2012
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2012.688489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Airborne Nanoparticles from Welding Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our daily life, office printers and photocopiers have been shown to form potentially toxic nanoaerosols in the air (He et al, 2007;McGarry et al, 2011;Bello et al, 2013). Similarly, it has been proven that welding, with similar local high temperature as in the operation of EDM, generates nanoparticles in high concentrations especially close to the sources (Lee et al, 2007;Pfefferkorn et al, 2010;Gomes et al, 2012;Gomes et al, 2014). However, health risks associated with EDM air pollution are not yet clearly understood (Andujar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our daily life, office printers and photocopiers have been shown to form potentially toxic nanoaerosols in the air (He et al, 2007;McGarry et al, 2011;Bello et al, 2013). Similarly, it has been proven that welding, with similar local high temperature as in the operation of EDM, generates nanoparticles in high concentrations especially close to the sources (Lee et al, 2007;Pfefferkorn et al, 2010;Gomes et al, 2012;Gomes et al, 2014). However, health risks associated with EDM air pollution are not yet clearly understood (Andujar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equipment indicates the human lung-deposited surface area of particles (ADSA) expressed as square micrometers per cubic centimeter of air (µm 2 / cm 3 ), corresponding to the alveolar region of the lung [4,12], measuring each 10 seconds. This equipment is based on diffusion charging of sampled particles, followed by detection of the charged aerosol using an electrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of new types of welding procedures and consumables, the number of welders exposed to welding fumes is continuously growing, in spite of the mechanization and automation of the welding processes [3] and individual welders' protection equipment is improving. The number of epidemiologic studies [4] has increased in recent years due to the increasing concern with welding fumes and more sophisticated equipment for ultrafine particle (UFP) detection and analysis. The influence of ultrafine particulate lying in the nano sized range, on human health has been pointed to be of much concern [5] as airborne ultrafine particles can also result from macroscopic common industrial processes such as welding [6].…”
Section: The Effect Of Metal Transfer Modes and Shielding Gas Composimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of exposure assessment in what regards nanoparticles, the most common procedure is the determination of the surface area deposited in the human lung (Oberdorster, 2000 ) referred further on as Alveolar Deposited Surface Area (ADSA), and is used with proved reliability for the size range of particles between 20 and 100 nm (Asbach et al, 2009), which means that the equipment could be operating very near its detection limit. However, Asbach et al (2009) concluded that the fraction below 20 nm usually contributes only negligibly to the total area surface and, therefore, it is not critical.The operation of this equipment is based on diffusion charging of sampled particles (Gomes et al, 2012a;Gomes et al, 2012b), followed by the detection of the charged aerosol using an electrometer, which uses the deposition model developed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Also, emitted nanoparticles were collected with a Nanometer Aerosol Sampler (NAS) TSI, Mod.…”
Section: Airborne Nanoparticles Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%