1976
DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(76)90010-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of acidic functional groups in low-rank coals: comparison of ion-exchange and non-aqueous titration methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maher and Schafer (35) found that the carboxyl contents determined with non-aqueous titration were always higher than those found by exchange with barium acetate. They infer from these results that some of the phenols may be titrating with the carboxyl groups due to the effect of the basic solvent ethylenediamine.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Titration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maher and Schafer (35) found that the carboxyl contents determined with non-aqueous titration were always higher than those found by exchange with barium acetate. They infer from these results that some of the phenols may be titrating with the carboxyl groups due to the effect of the basic solvent ethylenediamine.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Titration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…al. (8,34,35) investigated the use of this m&thod in the determination of 'arboxyl groups in coal. One of the principle advantages for its use on coal is that ethylenediamine causes swelling.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Titration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As evidenced by both quantum chemical calculations and a variety of characterization means, this adsorption-enhancing effect is attributed to the hydrogen bond interactions between hydrogen atoms on the carbon surface and CO 2 molecules, which is greatly enhanced by the presence of O atoms on the carbon surface. As we know, most oxygen-containing functional groups such as phenolic hydroxyl groups, carboxyl groups, lactone groups, and aldehyde groups show acid tendency [ 29 ]. According to the acid-base interacting mechanism currently accepted in this field, the presence of such acidic groups would show a negative effect on CO 2 adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%