1997
DOI: 10.1051/jp3:1997124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Détermination de la pression de vapeur de HgCl2 par la méthode d'effusion de Knudsen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is instructive to compare this case against an experiment where the exchange reaction was studied between gaseous HgBr 2 and solid HgCl 2 deposited on the surface of a frosted borosilicate (Pyrex) tube, similar as in our recently reported uptake experiments . Not only HgCl 2 is more volatile than HgBr 2 , but also its binding with the frosted tube is weaker than with the membrane. Hence, a significant amount of HgCl 2 was continuously desorbed into the helium flow and carried into ID-CIMS, producing a HgCl 2 F – signal approximately 100 times stronger than the signal of HgBr 2 F – (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is instructive to compare this case against an experiment where the exchange reaction was studied between gaseous HgBr 2 and solid HgCl 2 deposited on the surface of a frosted borosilicate (Pyrex) tube, similar as in our recently reported uptake experiments . Not only HgCl 2 is more volatile than HgBr 2 , but also its binding with the frosted tube is weaker than with the membrane. Hence, a significant amount of HgCl 2 was continuously desorbed into the helium flow and carried into ID-CIMS, producing a HgCl 2 F – signal approximately 100 times stronger than the signal of HgBr 2 F – (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…As no scale spallation could be detected by microscopic examinations, these mass losses were the result of oxide evaporation, as already observed for stainless steels [1][2][3][4]. Using the Knudsen effusion model [5] and FactSage [6] evaluation of the partial pressures of chromium trioxide and chromium (IV) oxohydroxides, mass losses were calculated to be 56 µg.cm -2 (304 and 316L), 43 µg.cm -2 (441) and 2 µg.cm -2 (430), in correct agreement with the differences between experimental mass and thickness values.…”
Section: High Temperature Corrosion and Protection Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Additionally, the fate of mercury captured on the adsorbent was expected to be in complex form rather than as mercury(II) chloride that can leach under Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Paper high pressure or accelerated conditions. 33,63,64 The possible mercury reaction mechanism is not conclusive enough to be reported without further in situ analytical work and needs to be probed for both copper and mercury centres. We anticipate that mercury fixation under these wet-gas conditions was via the formation of more stable mercury complexes on the silica support rather than in a molecular state of HgCl 2 , which was reported to be formed under drygas conditions.…”
Section: Reaction Chemistry and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%