2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01887-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination and prediction of the inherited ferrite texture in a HSLA steel produced by compact strip production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, ferrite orientations, resulting from the K-S model with and without variant selection and applied to different simulated parent textures, are analyzed and compared with published experimental results [23][24][25] in order to infer the most reliable austenitic texture.…”
Section: B Product Texturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, ferrite orientations, resulting from the K-S model with and without variant selection and applied to different simulated parent textures, are analyzed and compared with published experimental results [23][24][25] in order to infer the most reliable austenitic texture.…”
Section: B Product Texturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been reported that these techniques have certain difficulty in measuring pole figures of coarse grain materials, unpolished industrial samples, rather weak texture materials and multi-phase composite materials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Moreover, in order to precisely predict the macroscopic properties of a steel sheet, a high-quality statistical average texture (also called as global texture or bulk texture) is more valuable than the local plane texture obtained by X-ray diffraction or EBSD. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Though different sample preparation methods have been proposed rightly to measure the bulk texture of a sheet material by X-ray diffraction, 14,15) only the reflection method is applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] As compared with the conventional slab casting process, rapid cooling solidification processes show the merits of reducing capital and operational costs through omitting the intermediate rolling and heating installation and processing stages. Meanwhile the high cooling rate during strip-casting or thin slab casting, about 100 times higher than that of conventional slab casting, makes a quite diminished microsegregation of impurities in steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%