Determination and Prediction of Respirable Dust and Crystalline-Free Silica in the Taiwanese Foundry Industry

Abstract

Background: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) has been recognized as a human carcinogen; however, the measurement and analysis of RCS in small-scale foundries is rare and difficult. This study aimed to measure respirable dust and RCS levels among 236 foundry workers in Taiwan and used these data to establish predictive models for personal exposure. Methods: Personal sampling of various production processes were measured gravimetrically and analyzed using the X-ray diffraction method. Multiple linear regression was used to establish predictive models. Results: Foundry workers were exposed to geometric means and geometric standard deviations of 0.52 ± 4.0 mg/m3 and 0.027 ± 15 mg/m3 for respirable dust and RCS, respectively. The highest exposure levels were observed among workers in the sand blasting process, with geometric means of 1.6 mg/m3 and 0.099 mg/m3 for respirable dust and RCS, respectively. The predictive exposure model for respirable dust fitted the data well (R2 = 0.75; adjusted R2 = 0.64), and the predictive capacity for RCS was higher (R2 = 0.89; adjusted R2 = 0.84). Conclusions: Foundry workers in the sand blasting process may be exposed to the highest levels of respirable dust and RCS. The developed models can be applied to predict respirable dust and RCS levels adequately in small-scale foundry workers for epidemiological studies.

Occupational exposure to silica dust in Slovenia is grossly underestimated

“…Our analysis based on job descriptions associated with high risk of exposure (number of workers performing specific operations, Table 1 , last two columns) according to literature data ( 9 , 10 , 11 ), however, suggests a much higher number of exposed workers, namely 5,007, as opposed to the self-reported 2,072. The difference is most notable for workers in the construction industry ( Table 1 ).…”

“…To obtain exposure data on company workers we relied on an online questionnaire asking company representatives to estimate the number of employees regularly or occasionally exposed to silica, specify the type of operations their workers performed and for how long, and report environmental measurements of dust and silica concentrations in their work environment. To estimate the intensity of exposure to RCS, each work operation was classified as high, medium, or low exposure, based on the RCS concentration estimates for specific operations/jobs from literature ( 9 , 10 , 11 ).…”

Feasibility study on the application of electrospun nanofiber webs for the air sampling of crystalline silica

“…The casting section of an automobile part manufacturing plant was chosen as the location for air sampling, where the existence of silica had previously been proven. The type of materials used in this section of the plant included crystalline silica, casting sand, ferroalloys, scrap metal, and refractive materials 20) . According to Kakui et al (2013), the core room, casting room, smelting room, and shot blasting rooms are potential sites for silica contamination 21) .…”

Antibacterial applications and safety issues of silica‐based materials: A review

“…A recent assessment of the health and safety aspects of silica has discovered that silica dust may act as a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Investigative evidence of clinical pathological and experimental studies indicates that the level of silicon dust exposure (0‐13.4 mg/m 3 each year) might cause the development of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and small airway disease 117‐119 . Since 1997, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified crystalline silica as a Class 1 carcinogen.…”