Determination and Modeling of Mechanical Properties for Graphene Nanoplatelet/Epoxy Composites

Abstract

Structural components of modern aircraft, such as the fuselage and control surfaces, are commonly constructed using carbon‐filled polymer composites. The addition of graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) to traditional fiber‐reinforced composites often increases the tensile modulus. In this work, composites were fabricated with epoxy (EPON 862 with EPIKURE Curing Agent W) and 1–4 wt% (0.6–2.44 vol%) GNP. The GNP used in this study was Asbury Carbon's TC307. To the authors' knowledge, mechanical data for composites with TC307 have not been published before. Composite specimens were tested for macroscopic tensile modulus and modulus as determined by nanoindentation. The macroscopic tensile modulus increased from 2.72 GPa for neat epoxy to 2.93 GPa for 4 wt% (2.44 vol%) TC307 in epoxy. The modulus as determined by nanoindentation showed a similar trend. For all these composites, the tensile strength ranged from 76 to 81 MPa. A multiscale modeling approach, using molecular dynamics data and micromechanical modeling, was used to verify the experimental data, and both experiments and modeling demonstrated that a three‐dimensional random dispersion of GNP (∼3 to 4 layers) in epoxy was achieved. The constant level of strength with GNP loading is important in applications where GNP is added to the epoxy matrix to increase thermal and electrical conductivity. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:1845–1851, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers

Nanostructured ZnO Interphase for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites with Strain Rate Tailored Interfacial Strength

“…The following eliminates local strain concentrations in the vicinity of the fiber interfacial region and moves it away a considerable distance, and into the relatively tougher and more crack resistive epoxy matrix ( Figure 7A). Such findings also explain how a nanostructured gradient can result in large interfacial shear strengths that exceed that of the matrix [62] , thus avoiding matrix shear failure before interfacial debonding. Under such conditions, fiber pullout occurs when the ZnO nanowires/carbon fiber interface fails which is dependent on the chemical interaction between the ZnO interphase and the fiber surface.…”

A Green Route for Quick and Kilogram Production of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Applications at Low Loadings in Epoxy Resins

“…Such a change in morphology was considered responsible for the partial increase in the thermo‐mechanical stabilities of composites owing to the nanosizing effect of Graphene on Epoxy resin ,. The high surface area and occurrence of few functional groups in the rGO3 increased the interfacial adhesion between the filler and the polymeric chains, leading to noteworthy enhancement in thermo‐mechanical properties which was reflected in the fracture surface of the composites with 0.3% of loading ,. Moreover, the composite with 0.3% of rGO3 lodging possesses a wrinkled layer morphology which can be observed at a higher magnification (inset Figure d).…”

“…al. ,. To further examine the dispersion of Graphene sheet, their encapsulation with the Epoxy chains and enshrouding of Graphene sheets over the polymeric chains was analyzed with TEM instrument for E_0.3rGO3 (Figure e) .…”

Preparation of silica‐decorated graphene oxide nanohybrid system as a highly efficient reinforcement for woven jute fabric reinforced epoxy composites

“…Over the past decades, graphene oxide (GO), a twodimensional monolayer of covalently bonded carbon atoms in a honeycomb structure, has gained the great interest for the fabrication of polymer-matrix nanocomposites due to its outstanding mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. [8][9][10][11][12] The layered structure of GO contains hydroxyl ( OH), carboxyl ( COOH) and epoxy groups. However, due to the high surface area, π-π stacking and Van der Waals interaction, GO can be easily agglomerated within the polymeric matrix.…”