1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(97)00035-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination and fractionation of sulphur in a contaminated dredged sediment1

Abstract: Summary-Conversion of sulphur compounds in reduced, contaminated sediments that are brought in upland conditions may largely affect the potential mobility of heavy metal contaminants. We applied selected methods for the determination of total sulphur and sulphur fractions in a contaminated sediment in the reduced state and after gradual drying and oxidation during one month.Dry ashing, followed by ion chromatographic detection, was reliable for the determination of total sulphur. Good recoveries were obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudo-total metal contents in the soils were determined by an aqua regia destruction (Ure 1990) and analysed with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Varian Vista MPX, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). AVS contents were determined on fresh soil samples by conversion of sulphide to H 2 S and absorption in a Zn-acetate solution, followed by a back titration, as described by Tack et al (1997). The pH was measured in a 1/5 soil/distilled water suspension after equilibration during 18 h (Van Ranst et al 1999).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-total metal contents in the soils were determined by an aqua regia destruction (Ure 1990) and analysed with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Varian Vista MPX, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). AVS contents were determined on fresh soil samples by conversion of sulphide to H 2 S and absorption in a Zn-acetate solution, followed by a back titration, as described by Tack et al (1997). The pH was measured in a 1/5 soil/distilled water suspension after equilibration during 18 h (Van Ranst et al 1999).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results varied from 92.5 to 101.7% of the certified aqua regia extractable values. Acid volatile sulphide (AVS) was determined by transformation of sulphide to H 2 S and absorption in a Zn-acetate solution, followed by a back-titration (Tack et al, 1997). The pH was measured in a 1/5 soil/distilled water suspension after equilibration during 18 h (Van Ranst et al, 1999).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms that Fe and Mn might indeed have been subject to other processes, such as a re-adsorption by the soil or biotic compartments or migration to more oxic parts of the experimental setup and subsequent precipitation as oxides. Another possibility is that sulphides were formed which are not determined in the operational AVS analysis procedure, such as pyrite (Tack et al, 1997;Billon et al, 2001). Moreover, sulphide losses due to partial oxidation of the soil between sampling and analysis might have resulted in a discrepancy between the sulphide amounts which were present and those which were measured.…”
Section: Metal Concentrations In Pore Waters and Percolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This oxidation noticeably increases the bioavailability of heavy metals [13][14][15]. matter present in the sediment quickly occurs as the result of the activity of the autotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and heterotrophic aerobes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%