2010
DOI: 10.1002/tal.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination and comparison of wind loads for industrial reinforced concrete chimneys

Abstract: Like all other tall structures, determination of wind loads is important for industrial reinforced concrete chimneys. All countries use different wind load standards. These different wind load standards are compared with each other in some studies. For example, in one study by Zhou et al., major international codes and standards for tall buildings were compared.In the first part of this study, modelling information about 10 selected industrial reinforced concrete chimneys is given. All structural and material … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the distributions of the means and RMSE of shape coefficient along the circumferential direction for the hyperbolic cooling tower. They are compared with the standard in Code (GB50009‐2012, 2012, DL/T 5339‐2006 2006), the measured results, and the wind tunnel test data . The following conclusions are thus reached: The angles at which the extreme negative wind pressures and flow separation points are found on the distribution curve of the mean shape coefficient for the conical part are consistent with the curve for hyperbolic cooling tower in the Code.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Figure shows the distributions of the means and RMSE of shape coefficient along the circumferential direction for the hyperbolic cooling tower. They are compared with the standard in Code (GB50009‐2012, 2012, DL/T 5339‐2006 2006), the measured results, and the wind tunnel test data . The following conclusions are thus reached: The angles at which the extreme negative wind pressures and flow separation points are found on the distribution curve of the mean shape coefficient for the conical part are consistent with the curve for hyperbolic cooling tower in the Code.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As the procedures of the cited standards are open to public, there is no need to define all of the symbols in the wind load calculations. One can obtain the details of the wind loading calculations in these studies [55][56][57][58][59]. Also, in these wind load calculations, basic wind speed is taken as 45 m/s.…”
Section: Calculation Of Wind Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non‐complex terrain up to a height of about 100–200 m above ground level, it is reasonable to assume that the wind profile follows the logarithmic law under the neutral conditions. Then, the vertical distribution of mean wind speed can be expressed as Equation (Karaca and Türkeli, ). Utrue¯z=1ku*normalln()zz0 where z is the height above the ground, k is the von Karman constant (approximately 0.4), z 0 is the surface roughness length and the typical values of different type of terrains that were listed in literature (Burton et al ., ; Holmes, ), u * is the friction velocity and can be calculated according to Equation .…”
Section: Characteristics Of Near‐ground Windmentioning
confidence: 99%