2013
DOI: 10.4038/sljhrm.v3i1.5095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Union Participation of Public Sector Organizations in Sri Lanka

Abstract: This study explores the relationship between various predictors of union participation namely; union loyalty, union instrumentality, them and us attitude and workplace collectivism on employees' willingness to participate in union activities of public sector organizations in Sri Lanka. A structured questionnaire was distributed among randomly selected sample of 254 unionized employees in seven large scale highly unionized public sector organizations. The statistical results of the study revealed that member at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed causal paths of this study are consistent with the broader theoretical traditions from which they emerge. For instance, extensive research has causally linked: commitment, instrumentality, support perceptions, general pro-union attitudes and union ideology to union participation (see Bolton et al , 2007; Gamage and Hewagama, 2012; Sinclair and Tetrick, 1995; Chan et al , 2006; Gibney et al , 2012, respectively); and union participation to behavior effectiveness (see Choo and Perry, 2009; Geare et al , 2009; Freeman and Medoff, 1984; Gomez-Mejia and Balkin, 1984; Larson and Fukami, 1984). While the present study and an extensive array of similar studies provide a strong theoretical basis for the proposed pattern of effects presented here, the possibility of reverse causality between the variables in the theoretical model cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed causal paths of this study are consistent with the broader theoretical traditions from which they emerge. For instance, extensive research has causally linked: commitment, instrumentality, support perceptions, general pro-union attitudes and union ideology to union participation (see Bolton et al , 2007; Gamage and Hewagama, 2012; Sinclair and Tetrick, 1995; Chan et al , 2006; Gibney et al , 2012, respectively); and union participation to behavior effectiveness (see Choo and Perry, 2009; Geare et al , 2009; Freeman and Medoff, 1984; Gomez-Mejia and Balkin, 1984; Larson and Fukami, 1984). While the present study and an extensive array of similar studies provide a strong theoretical basis for the proposed pattern of effects presented here, the possibility of reverse causality between the variables in the theoretical model cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the previous research in the domain of union participation also draws on primary data for generalizing about the population at large (Bose and Mudgal, 2012; Gamage and Hewagama, 2012; Gibney et al , 2012). This study uses a cross-sectional field survey design wherein the identified variables are measured at the same point in time, using a single questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research carried out by Cohen (1994) cited in Gamage et al, (2012) show that Union participation can be measured by using various dimensions. He empirically identified the similarities and differences among six forms of union participation; union commitment, participation in decision making (Naidoo, 2003) participation in union activities, attitudinal militancy, serving in elected offices and the propensity to strike.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research on union participation considered it as a multi dimensional construct (McShane, 1986;Cohen, 1994;Fullagar et al, 1995;Tetrick et al, 2007;Jinadasa & Opatha, 1999cited in Gamage et al, 2012. Shore and Newton (1995 cited in Gamage et al, 2012) in their study included measures such as communication and civic virtue.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation