2007
DOI: 10.1186/1476-072x-6-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of the geographic distribution of Puumala virus and Lyme borreliosis infections in Belgium

Abstract: Background: Vector-borne and zoonotic diseases generally display clear spatial patterns due to different space-dependent factors. Land cover and land use influence disease transmission by controlling both the spatial distribution of vectors or hosts, and the probability of contact with susceptible human populations. The objective of this study was to combine environmental and socio-economic factors to explain the spatial distribution of two emerging human diseases in Belgium, Puumala virus (PUUV) and Lyme borr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
120
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
120
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest single positive correlate of SNV prevalence was precipitation, possibly related to virus survival in the environment (Linard et al 2007) or food availability for rodents, but positive effects of island area and negative effects of predator diversity (which co-varied) were also significant in a multi-variate model. The point is made that types of predators, avian or mammalian, and their degree of specialization, may be as important as diversity in driving rodent population fluctuations and thereby variable virus transmission potential .…”
Section: I M I T E D E V I D E N C E F O R D I L U T I N G E F F E mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest single positive correlate of SNV prevalence was precipitation, possibly related to virus survival in the environment (Linard et al 2007) or food availability for rodents, but positive effects of island area and negative effects of predator diversity (which co-varied) were also significant in a multi-variate model. The point is made that types of predators, avian or mammalian, and their degree of specialization, may be as important as diversity in driving rodent population fluctuations and thereby variable virus transmission potential .…”
Section: I M I T E D E V I D E N C E F O R D I L U T I N G E F F E mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased rodent species richness and abundance may permit the presence of greater pathogen diversity [86,149,150] because different rodents harbor different pathogens, though some species can be co-infected with multiple pathogens including Leptospira, Babesia and Hantaviruses [150]. Because rodent-associated pathogens are generally spread by direct contact, inhalation and ingestion of rodent saliva, urine and feces [151], exposure risk can increase with the abundance and density of infected rodents, particularly when human-wildlife interfaces favor greater contact [152].…”
Section: Abandonment and Exposure Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the 2000s satellite-image based forest landscape data for this region became available (Reese et al 2003) and even more recently more detailed aerial photo-based landscape data, directly matched to the current sampling plots (Ecke et al 2013) has changed the situation. Together, these have increased the potential to perform landscape-scale studies on vole populations (Hö rnfeldt et al 2006, Christensen et al Langlois et al 2001, Glass et al 2002, Linard et al 2007a. Bank voles in general and PUUV antibody positive bank voles occurred frequently on the habitat scale in old forest, followed by cut-over forest and mires as the least important.…”
Section: Spatial Variation Of Puuv Antibody Positive Bank Volesmentioning
confidence: 99%