2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of safety outcomes and performance: A systematic literature review of research in four high-risk industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To sum up the empirical work in a comprehensive meta-analysis, Nahrgang et al (2011) reported a substantial variance (25% to 49%) caused by safety climate in near misses. However, in the most recent review on safety outcomes (Cornelissen, Hoof, & Jong, 2017) stated that safety climate and near miss's relationship needs more rigorous investigation as the existing literature is very limited and requires further investigation to establish this relationship. Although the limited literature does provide evidence about safety climate and near miss's relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up the empirical work in a comprehensive meta-analysis, Nahrgang et al (2011) reported a substantial variance (25% to 49%) caused by safety climate in near misses. However, in the most recent review on safety outcomes (Cornelissen, Hoof, & Jong, 2017) stated that safety climate and near miss's relationship needs more rigorous investigation as the existing literature is very limited and requires further investigation to establish this relationship. Although the limited literature does provide evidence about safety climate and near miss's relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to present an overview of techniques addressed in both quantitative and qualitative research on occupational safety, and their general direction (e.g. Cornelissen et al, 2017). Below, we will elaborate on our systematic selection process and analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first study (to the authors' knowledge) in which a breakdown of mining subsector differences has been reported in the United States. In a recent systematic review of safety outcomes and H&S performance in high-risk industries, underground mining was not included because the commodity was said to represent highly specific risks [Cornelissen et al 2017]. However, there is some overlap in results with a large safety culture initiative in the Australian mining industry surveyed coal and gold mine workers, where coal miners at the hourly/contractor level were significantly more negative [SAFEmap 1999].…”
Section: Differences Among Subsectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%