2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of response to repeat hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected prior non-responders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the standard-dose group in our study had a 51% response to HBV revaccination. Looking at previously published data from studies using a standard-dose regimen, this response rate is higher than the 27% reported in Rowney et al and the 29% reported by Bloom et al, but lower than the 59% response reported by Psevdos et al and the 67% reported by Rey et al The wide difference in the HBV vaccination response rate among studies using standard dosage could be related to several factors: study design, patient selection, intervals between vaccination doses, and type of vaccine used . Difference in patient selection, number or prior vaccine doses, and the use of a booster dose prior to randomization could explain the higher response in the ARNS B-BOOST trial as compared with the lower response with standard dosage found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the standard-dose group in our study had a 51% response to HBV revaccination. Looking at previously published data from studies using a standard-dose regimen, this response rate is higher than the 27% reported in Rowney et al and the 29% reported by Bloom et al, but lower than the 59% response reported by Psevdos et al and the 67% reported by Rey et al The wide difference in the HBV vaccination response rate among studies using standard dosage could be related to several factors: study design, patient selection, intervals between vaccination doses, and type of vaccine used . Difference in patient selection, number or prior vaccine doses, and the use of a booster dose prior to randomization could explain the higher response in the ARNS B-BOOST trial as compared with the lower response with standard dosage found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Psevdos et al reported a response rate between 59% and 85% using a high-dose regimen at 0, 1, and 6 months in 101 retrospectively analyzed patients. Similarly, Rowley et al reported a 64% to 75% response to high-dose repeat HBV vaccinations. In their randomized clinical trial (the ANRS B-BOOST trial), Rey et al described a 74% response in a double-dose group using 0, 1, and 6 months interval dosage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These results were confirmed in sub-group analyses (< 350 and 350-500 CD4 cells/mm3). 57 Two retrospective studies found similar response rates of 67% 59 and 64% 28 to doubledose rescue vaccinations. Another retrospective study 60 found a response rate of 81.5% in subjects receiving an accelerated rescue schedule (40 mg at M0-1-2) after failure of a classic chedule.…”
Section: Strategies In Patients Who Were Vaccinated But Without Seropmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While there were no data on other HepB vaccine regimens in liver-transplanted children, several HepB vaccine regimens have been assessed in HIV-infected people. Several studies found a high response rate and a greater GMT of anti-HBs after 72 weeks of follow-up in multiple doses of the double-dose regimen [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Regarding these results, the international guidelines recommend a three double-dose rescue HepB vaccination in HIV-infected populations with anti-HB loss [18,25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%