2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of reproductive success: A comparative study of five endangered river corridor plants in fragmented habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small Genista populations consisted of merely one or a few patches, and nearby populations or individuals for effective pollen exchange were lacking. The smaller number of seeds in small populations was compensated by an increased seed mass, a trade-off that has been demonstrated in some previous studies (e.g., Greenway and Harder, 2007;Vaughton and Ramsey, 1998;Winter et al, 2008). The overall reproductive success in G. pilosa remained unaffected by population size.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentation Population Size and Pollination Successmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Small Genista populations consisted of merely one or a few patches, and nearby populations or individuals for effective pollen exchange were lacking. The smaller number of seeds in small populations was compensated by an increased seed mass, a trade-off that has been demonstrated in some previous studies (e.g., Greenway and Harder, 2007;Vaughton and Ramsey, 1998;Winter et al, 2008). The overall reproductive success in G. pilosa remained unaffected by population size.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentation Population Size and Pollination Successmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2006; Leimu et al. 2006; Winter, Lehmann & Diekmann 2008; Schleuning et al. 2009), other recent studies have found no clear association between population size and reproductive output, or even declines in per capita seed set in large populations (Brys, Jacquemyn & Hermy 2008; Spigler & Chang 2008, 2009; Rabasa, Gutierrez & Escudero 2009; Tsaliki & Diekmann 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the many reported instances of declining reproductive output in smaller populations (e.g. Fischer & Matthies 1998;Kery, Matthies & Spillmann 2000;Wolf & Harrison 2001;and reviews by Hobbs & Yates 2003;Johnson et al 2004;Ghazoul 2005;Aguilar et al 2006;Leimu et al 2006;Winter, Lehmann & Diekmann 2008;Schleuning et al 2009), other recent studies have found no clear association between population size and reproductive output, or even declines in per capita seed set in large populations (Brys, Jacquemyn & Hermy 2008;Spigler & Chang 2008Rabasa, Gutierrez & Escudero 2009;Tsaliki & Diekmann 2009). Intraspecific resource competition and, alternatively, pollinator limitation, have been proposed as explanations for limited or declining seed set within large populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most studies addressing the population biology of various plant species investigate specific life-cycle stages or single traits, such as seed production, seedling survival or population size (e.g., [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]). However, to understand the causes of changes in population size, it is necessary to investigate the complete life cycle of a species, as it is only by putting the various life-cycle transitions into the context of the whole life cycle that we can understand the consequences of the differences in single life history traits for the dynamics of a population (e.g., [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%