2018
DOI: 10.1101/459966
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of QTL mapping power in the realized Collaborative Cross

Abstract: The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a mouse genetic reference population whose range of applications includes quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. The design of a CC QTL mapping study involves multiple decisions, including which and how many strains to use, and how many replicates per strain to phenotype, all viewed within the context of hypothesized QTL architecture. Until now, these decisions have been informed largely by early power analyses that were based on simulated, hypothetical CC genomes. Now that more… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early large-scale studies in incipient CC strains successfully mapped many traits [32] and CC lines were used to map motor performance and body weight [75], energy balance traits [76], exercise physiology [67], toxicology [77], perinatal nutrition in CC RIX lines [78], kidney phenotypes [79], and hematological phenotypes [80]. Although CC mice were intended as a genetic mapping population and were used as such in these early studies, the power of the extant strains is sufficient only to large-effects alleles, typically observed in studies of Mendelian traits [81]. They are therefore useful for reproducible mapping of molecular phenotypes such as cis-expression QTL (eQTL) and epigenetic regulation, which typically exhibit Mendelian genetic variation.…”
Section: Finding Regulatory Mechanisms For Trait Variation In Do Micementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early large-scale studies in incipient CC strains successfully mapped many traits [32] and CC lines were used to map motor performance and body weight [75], energy balance traits [76], exercise physiology [67], toxicology [77], perinatal nutrition in CC RIX lines [78], kidney phenotypes [79], and hematological phenotypes [80]. Although CC mice were intended as a genetic mapping population and were used as such in these early studies, the power of the extant strains is sufficient only to large-effects alleles, typically observed in studies of Mendelian traits [81]. They are therefore useful for reproducible mapping of molecular phenotypes such as cis-expression QTL (eQTL) and epigenetic regulation, which typically exhibit Mendelian genetic variation.…”
Section: Finding Regulatory Mechanisms For Trait Variation In Do Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only large-effect QTL accounting for N50% variance can be mapped with single samples from 50 strains at 80% estimated power. Increased subsampling within strains may enable mapping of moderate effects explaining N20% variance [81]. These effect sizes are typically seen only in highly penetrant Mendelian traits or molecular traits.…”
Section: Experimental Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies allow greater choice over the population's extent of genetic heterogeneity and each population has specific advantages in noise reduction for detection of small effect alleles or a broad survey of very high genetic heterogeneity with variation in nearly every gene in the genome. Minor allele frequencies in even the most complex mouse populations such as the Diversity Outbred (DO) are theoretically 12.5%, providing greater power for detection of variants that influence complex traits in substantially smaller sample sizes than required in human populations . With the exception of large‐scale prospective studies including the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development and All‐of‐US, studies in humans are generally limited to subjects who are already addicted, restricting the ability to separate premorbid, drug‐naïve traits from the effects of ongoing drug use.…”
Section: Modeling Addiction‐related Behavior Using Laboratory Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Mapping studies in natural populations, such as quantitative trait loci (QTL) studies and genomewide association studies (GWAS), have the potential to allow for the identification of multiple genetic variants influencing a complex trait in the natural genetic context in which the variants occur. [43][44][45] In human populations, while learning, memory and general cognitive function are known to be heritable, 4,20 they are also influenced strongly by a suite of environmental factors, which obviously cannot be systematically controlled in human studies. Assaying learning and memory is often labor-intensive, requiring repeated behavioral trials, 1 making it difficult to assay the large numbers of individuals typically required for high power to detect all but the highest effect QTL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genetic mapping studies have been challenging to perform for learning and memory phenotypes. [43][44][45] There have been a few successes where a causative natural variant for learning or memory has been identified. [43][44][45] In human populations, while learning, memory and general cognitive function are known to be heritable, 4,20 they are also influenced strongly by a suite of environmental factors, which obviously cannot be systematically controlled in human studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%