2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.02.21265767
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK)

Abstract: BackgroundProspective population-based studies investigating multiple determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 are lacking.MethodsWe did a prospective population-based study in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-naive UK adults between May 1 and Nov 2, 2020. Information on 88 potential risk factors was obtained through online questionnaires, and combined IgG/IgA/IgM responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein were determined in dried blood spots. We used logistic and linear regression to estimate adjust… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, pre-vaccination serostatus was not available for all participants in these studies; this omission is potentially important, because unvaccinated people of South Asian ethnic origin were at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pre-vaccination era. 20,24 We demonstrate for the first time that higher anti-spike titres among vaccinated people of South Asian origin are not attributable to the higher rates of pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection that we have previously reported. 20,24 The reasons for this phenomenon require further investigation: ethnic variation in recognition of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes is recognised, 32 and it may be that analogous variation in B cell epitopes underlies the ethnic differences in antibody responses to vaccination seen here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, pre-vaccination serostatus was not available for all participants in these studies; this omission is potentially important, because unvaccinated people of South Asian ethnic origin were at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pre-vaccination era. 20,24 We demonstrate for the first time that higher anti-spike titres among vaccinated people of South Asian origin are not attributable to the higher rates of pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection that we have previously reported. 20,24 The reasons for this phenomenon require further investigation: ethnic variation in recognition of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes is recognised, 32 and it may be that analogous variation in B cell epitopes underlies the ethnic differences in antibody responses to vaccination seen here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…20,24 We demonstrate for the first time that higher anti-spike titres among vaccinated people of South Asian origin are not attributable to the higher rates of pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection that we have previously reported. 20,24 The reasons for this phenomenon require further investigation: ethnic variation in recognition of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes is recognised, 32 and it may be that analogous variation in B cell epitopes underlies the ethnic differences in antibody responses to vaccination seen here. By contrast with ethnicity, several studies have investigated the impact of BMI on post-vaccination antibody titres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conducted a three-arm parallel open-label individually-randomized controlled trial nested within the population-based COVIDENCE UK cohort study, 12,13 using ‘trial-within-cohort’ methodology. 23 Eligibility was assessed using self-reported data from on-line questionnaires.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar to those reported previously for the whole COVIDENCE UK cohort. 7 4979 (66.1%) participants received two doses of ChAdOx1 and 2455 (32.6%) participants received two doses of BNT162b2, with most remaining participants either receiving NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax; 37 [0.5%] participants) or a combination of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 (31 [0.4%] participants). Blood samples were provided a median of 56 days (IQR 43–68) after full vaccination, and follow-up ended a median of 26 weeks (24–28) after full vaccination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%