Determinants of physician empathy during medical education: hypothetical conclusions from an exploratory qualitative survey of practicing physicians

Abstract

BackgroundEmpathy is an outcome-relevant physician characteristic and thus a crucial component of high-quality communication in health care. However, the factors that promote and inhibit the development of empathy during medical education have not been extensively researched. Also, currently there is no explicit research on the perspective of practicing physicians on the subject. Therefore the aim of our study was to explore physicians’ views of the positive and negative influences on the development of empathy during their medical education, as well as in their everyday work as physicians.MethodWe administered a written Qualitative Short Survey to 63 physicians in seven specialties. They were able to respond anonymously. Our open-ended question was: “What educational content in the course of your studies and/or your specialist training had a positive or negative effect on your empathy?” We analyzed the data using thematic content analysis following Mayring’s approach.ResultsForty-two physicians took part in our survey. All together, they mentioned 68 specific factors (37 positive, 29 negative, 2 neutral) from which six themes emerged: 1. In general, medical education does not promote the development of empathy. 2. Recognizing the psycho-social dimensions of care fosters empathy. 3. Interactions with patients in medical practice promote empathy. 4. Physicians’ active self-development through reflective practice helps the development of empathy. 5. Interactions with colleagues can both promote and inhibit empathy through their role modeling of empathic and non-empathic behavior. 6. Stress, time pressure, and adverse working conditions are detrimental to empathy development.ConclusionsOur results provide an overview of what might influence the development of clinical empathy, as well as hypothetical conclusions about how to promote it. Reflective practice seems to be lacking in current medical curricula and could be incorporated. Raising physicians’ awareness of the psycho-social dimension of disease, and of the impact of peer influence and role modeling, seems promising in this regard, too. Stress and well-being seem to be closely related to physician empathy, and their modulation must take into account individual, social, and organizational factors. Further research should investigate whether or how these hypothetical conclusions can deepen our understanding of the determinants of physician empathy in order to help its promotion.

Effect of Educational Intervention on Empowering the Sense of Empathy in Medical Students: Application of Health Belief Model

“…In the above-mentioned studies (31,32), as in the present study, empathy skills training had a positive effect on the empathic performance of medical students.…”

“…Given the importance of this issue, they recommend workshops and training courses on empathy for physicians (32).…”

Student empathy levels across 12 medical and health professions: an interventional study

“…The experience of others may include complex perspectives, reactions and emotions that are not externally visible and that exist in the context of the life of an individual. In lay terms, we could say that empathy is the ability to put oneself into another's shoes, and to demonstrate that one knows what it is like to be in their shoes [10,11]. Empathy is often confused with sympathy, but there is an important distinction: empathy is about shared understanding, while sympathy is about shared emotion [9,12].…”

Levels of empathy in undergraduate emergency health, nursing, and midwifery students: a longitudinal study

“…For example, even a simple statement such as “That must be very difficult for you” legitimizes the patient’s reaction and reassures them the practitioner has understood the situation. The perspective-taking component has been described as a major dimension of empathy in patient care 4,11…”