2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Impairment and Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies demonstrated that moderate AS is associated with a marked incremental risk for mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF. 2,3 In addition, Hayward et al 34 showed that the major determinant of outcomes in 169 patients with moderate AS and reduced LVEF was the degree of LV systolic impairment assessed by LV GLS rather than LVEF. 34 However, even patients with moderate AS and preserved LVEF show an increased risk for adverse LV GLS as a continuous variable and in dichotomous format (according to the three groups) were separately introduced in the multivariable model.…”
Section: Prognostic Role Of LV Gls In Moderate Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies demonstrated that moderate AS is associated with a marked incremental risk for mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF. 2,3 In addition, Hayward et al 34 showed that the major determinant of outcomes in 169 patients with moderate AS and reduced LVEF was the degree of LV systolic impairment assessed by LV GLS rather than LVEF. 34 However, even patients with moderate AS and preserved LVEF show an increased risk for adverse LV GLS as a continuous variable and in dichotomous format (according to the three groups) were separately introduced in the multivariable model.…”
Section: Prognostic Role Of LV Gls In Moderate Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 In addition, Hayward et al 34 showed that the major determinant of outcomes in 169 patients with moderate AS and reduced LVEF was the degree of LV systolic impairment assessed by LV GLS rather than LVEF. 34 However, even patients with moderate AS and preserved LVEF show an increased risk for adverse LV GLS as a continuous variable and in dichotomous format (according to the three groups) were separately introduced in the multivariable model. events, 7 which may be partially explained by the presence of underlying LV myocardial fibrosis.…”
Section: Prognostic Role Of LV Gls In Moderate Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a study of a younger population of patients with moderate AS (n = 514) by Lancelotti et al [ 4 ] found a 4-year survival of 89 %, it is recognized that AS, even when not severe, can impart significant myocardial architectural changes. Increases in LV mass, mid-wall fibrosis, and extracellular volume can occur with progression of AS, even when not severe [ 18 22 ]. As reversibility of cardiac damage with AVR has been shown in severe AS, there is rationale for consideration of AVR in patients with moderate AS and LV dysfunction [ 23 – 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of early markers of myocardial damage may therefore also improve the risk stratification of patients with moderate AS. Hayward and colleagues [ 18 ] showed that the degree of LV systolic dysfunction assessed by LV GLS, rather than LVEF, was the major determinant of outcome in 169 patients with moderate AS and reduced LVEF. Stassen et al demonstrated that LV GLS was independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients with moderate AS and preserved LV.…”
Section: Latest Developments In the Management Of Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%