2016
DOI: 10.17706/ijeeee.2016.6.1.21-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Online Religious Service Acceptance: An Empirical Investigation

Abstract: Abstract:The purpose of this research aims to improve the understanding of what motivates individual users to use online religious services, and which factors affect those motivations, based on the theory of the technology acceptance model (TAM). The research examines the reasons for the success of these websites, as well as the reasons why the users accept the new religious media, in light of the cultural and social advantages that affect Internet religious use in Taiwan. The research model was tested by usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, religiosity exerts a considerable positive effect on respectively PEOU, intention and PU. These results align with previous studies on the effect of religiosity on PEOU and technology acceptance in periods of pandemics (Faturohman et al ., 2021; Shuai, 2016).…”
Section: Measurements Validity and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, religiosity exerts a considerable positive effect on respectively PEOU, intention and PU. These results align with previous studies on the effect of religiosity on PEOU and technology acceptance in periods of pandemics (Faturohman et al ., 2021; Shuai, 2016).…”
Section: Measurements Validity and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers continue to modify TAM. They add new variables in the TAM model such as gender (Szajna, 1996), prior experience (Gefen & Straub, 1997), subjective norms (Taylor & Todd, 1995a), short-term and long-term usefulness (Taylor & Todd, 1995b), belief before and after technology adoption (Chau, 1996) Since 2000, several researchers integrating new construct into the TAM model such as social influence and cognitive instrumental process (Karahanna et al, 1999Merikivi et al, 2012) change and perception formation (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000) , compatibility (Venkatesh, 2000), risk and trust (Chau & Hu, 2002) , object-based belief and attitudes (Pavlou P.A., 2003), national culture (Wixom & Todd, 2005) , adoption constraints (Srite & Karahanna, 2006), personality (Yarbrough & Smith, 2007), motivation (Ali et al, 2016;Chan-Olmsted & Shay, 2016;Devaraj et al, 2008), emotion (Fosso Wamba et al, 2017;Kim, 2012;Malhotra et al, 2008), engagement and user satisfaction (Lee et al, 2012;Sträub, 2009), social cognitive (Lim et al, 2013), the user's critical mass (Khang et al, 2014), technological capabilities and reliability (Lee et al, 2013), religious experience (Rauniar et al, 2014), technology and social access (Shuai, 2016), and privacy (Chang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet has made online learning possible [1]. people can arrange their own learning time and place freely when they are learning through the network [2]. As a learning method, of course the development process requires a systematic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%