2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9732-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of nocturnal Lepidopteran diversity and community structure in a conifer-dominated forest

Abstract: Prediction of community response of fauna to anthropogenic or environmental disturbance requires knowledge of faunal distribution and abundance as well as an understanding of the mechanisms underlying community organization. We investigated linkages between Lepidoptera, one of the most influential insect taxa in forested ecosystems, and vegetation in riparian areas of conifer-dominated forests of western Oregon, USA. Using model selection techniques, we found that canopy cover explained variability in patterns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several damage types were affected by plant diversity, but effects were weak and direction differed among damage types. Varying effects among damage types have also been found in other studies [16], [62], [77]. While chewing damage on beech decreased with plant diversity in our study, gall mites, mines and Phyllaphis fagi increased in abundance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Several damage types were affected by plant diversity, but effects were weak and direction differed among damage types. Varying effects among damage types have also been found in other studies [16], [62], [77]. While chewing damage on beech decreased with plant diversity in our study, gall mites, mines and Phyllaphis fagi increased in abundance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…), and diversity of woody plants also reflects three‐dimensional habitat structure (e.g. Ober and Hayes ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a negative effect of vegetation clutter on presence (Ford et al, 2006;Loeb and O'Keefe, 2006;Patriquin and Barclay, 2003) and activity Humes et al, 1999;Ober and Hayes, 2010) is well-documented for some bat species, studies that have examined detection probability relative to vegetation clutter have found little influence (Amelon, 2007;Yates and Muzika, 2006;but see O'Keefe et al, 2014). Although basal area was included in detection models for 4 species/groups we examined, direction of relationship could only be determined for red/ Seminole and big brown bats.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%