2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33940-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of mortality after hip fracture surgery in Sweden: a registry-based retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Surgery for hip fractures is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The causes of poor outcome are not fully understood and may be related to other factors than the surgery itself. The relative contributions of patient, surgical, anaesthetic and structural factors have seldom been studied together. This study, a retrospective registry-based cohort study of 14 932 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in Sweden from 1st of January 2014 to 31st of December 2016, aimed to identify important predictors o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(61 reference statements)
5
43
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Independent Discussion: Reducing mortality in this population may prove challenging given the urgent nature of surgery and comorbidity-driven risk factors. 10,11 Surgical factors (e.g. bone cementation 11 ) could be further explored.…”
Section: Strengths Original Discussion: '1) the Study Was A Randomizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Independent Discussion: Reducing mortality in this population may prove challenging given the urgent nature of surgery and comorbidity-driven risk factors. 10,11 Surgical factors (e.g. bone cementation 11 ) could be further explored.…”
Section: Strengths Original Discussion: '1) the Study Was A Randomizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidity burden may be a significant driver of postoperative mortality after hip fracture, as demonstrated here and in prior investigations. 10,11 Commentary: In the Original Discussion, the investigators focus on reasons why the findings of the current study were different from a smaller previous study with a similar design done by the same team. 6 The Independent Discussant notes that while there has been little research examining whether depth of sedation affects outcomes after hip fracture surgery, several clinical trials and observational studies have investigated whether the outcomes are different after general anaesthesia vs regional anaesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…All study patients received spinal anesthesia (with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl), as is routine for 85% of AHF‐patients in our department. There are no large prospective studies demonstrating any advantage of neuro‐axial or general anesthesia on mortality, and the effects of anesthesia per se were not further scrutinized in this investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An acute hip fracture (AHF), the second most common orthopedic fracture type in Scandinavia (and other regions), represents a major trauma, affecting elderly, often frail, patients, with considerable risk for poor outcome. Mortality is high, 7‐11% at 30 days, 10‐20% at 90 days, 25‐40% at one year, and about 50% three years after surgery . The patient's autonomy and quality‐of‐life is often restricted after AHF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture per se is a severe trauma to the individual, inducing pain as well as short‐ and often long‐term disability. The mortality rates, after an AHF, are approximately 6%‐8% at 30 days increasing to 23%‐29% at 1 year . The mortality rate increases by age, male gender and the presence of comorbidities, predominantly heart failure and pulmonary infections …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%