2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0210-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of male territorial behavior in a Hungarian collared flycatcher population: plumage traits of residents and challengers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
104
3
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
104
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Twice each for 11 additional banded males (3 inland and 8 coastal), we simulated intrusion in 2005 using broadcast song only (via the methods described by Searcy et al 1997) to control for the effect of badge differences between the mount and the focal male on his behavioral response (Garamszegi et al 2006). Detailed descriptions of the methods of this experiment are described in Liu et al (2008).…”
Section: Reproductive and Territoriality Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twice each for 11 additional banded males (3 inland and 8 coastal), we simulated intrusion in 2005 using broadcast song only (via the methods described by Searcy et al 1997) to control for the effect of badge differences between the mount and the focal male on his behavioral response (Garamszegi et al 2006). Detailed descriptions of the methods of this experiment are described in Liu et al (2008).…”
Section: Reproductive and Territoriality Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that large-patched males are subject to increased aggression during the mating period (Garamszegi et al 2006) and that increased stress may alter their parental behaviour even if they are of superior quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Swedish population of this species, the white wing patch is known to be important in extra-pair mate choice (Sheldon and Ellegren 1999) but was found to be unrelated to the body condition of the males (Garant et al 2004). In our Hungarian study population, however, wing patch size is unrelated to extra-pair paternity (Rosivall et al 2009), but it is a condition-dependent signal (Török et al 2003) and has an important role in male territorial behaviour (Garamszegi et al 2006). On the other hand, forehead patch is a condition-dependent signal in the Swedish population (Gustafsson et al 1995;Sheldon et al 1997;Qvarnström 1999) but not so in our Hungarian population (Hegyi et al 2002(Hegyi et al , 2006b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Male forehead patch size is relatively less condition-dependent than male and female wing patch size [71], [72]. Male and female wing patch sizes, but not male forehead patch size, seem important in intrasexual competition [88], [89], but all three patch sizes seem to play a role in social mate acquisition [72], [102]. Plumage-level spectral features, on the other hand, have yet to be examined in this species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%