2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0828-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of male reproductive success in American black bears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result suggests that the body size of male bears is adapted to regional nutrient availability over several generations but not within a generation, and the geographical variation in diets causes the geographical variation in the body size of brown bear subpopulations. Generally, a larger size is advantageous when in competition for mates, so male body size should be related to reproductive success (McLellan 1994;Schwartz et al 2003;Zedrosser et al 2007;Costello et al 2009). Therefore, size should be an adaptive characteristic of male bears; they should exhibit larger overall sizes when the available nutrients are plentiful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result suggests that the body size of male bears is adapted to regional nutrient availability over several generations but not within a generation, and the geographical variation in diets causes the geographical variation in the body size of brown bear subpopulations. Generally, a larger size is advantageous when in competition for mates, so male body size should be related to reproductive success (McLellan 1994;Schwartz et al 2003;Zedrosser et al 2007;Costello et al 2009). Therefore, size should be an adaptive characteristic of male bears; they should exhibit larger overall sizes when the available nutrients are plentiful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictor variables for model building included sex (S ¼ 0 female and 1 male), age (A ¼ yr), age ). I initially created sex-specific models because growth curves show large differences between the sexes in rate of body size gain and mature weight (Mahoney et al 2001;Costello et al 2009;Bartareau 2011;Bartareau et al 2012). I tested for sex differences in model intercept and coefficient of predictor variables and combined models if they did not differ.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I tested for sex differences in model intercept and coefficient of predictor variables and combined models if they did not differ. I assessed the effect of age as a quadratic function, assuming a nonlinear increase in growth to an asymptote (Mahoney et al 2001;Bartareau 2011) and decrease in weight associated with senescence (Noyce and Garshelis 1994;Costello et al 2009). I assessed the effect of body length because it is an indicator of skeletal size and maturity (Mahoney et al 2001;Bartareau 2011).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations