1993
DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
291
0
10

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
291
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…we contribute to the individual-differences literature in demonstrating the importance of ethical development for predicting technical and work performance; (b) our findings echo previous research (e.g., Hunton et al 2000;Libby & Luft 1993;Schmidt & Hunter, 2004) regarding the mediating role of knowledge in predicting work performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we contribute to the individual-differences literature in demonstrating the importance of ethical development for predicting technical and work performance; (b) our findings echo previous research (e.g., Hunton et al 2000;Libby & Luft 1993;Schmidt & Hunter, 2004) regarding the mediating role of knowledge in predicting work performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As noted by Schmidt and Hunter (2004, p. 170), "the major mediating link between GMA and job performance is job knowledge" (see also Hunton, Wier, & Stone 2000;Libby & Luft, 1993). It is important to note that the specified exogenous variables (e.g., personality, ethical development) should correlate both with the endogenous variables (i.e., technical performance) and with the dependent variable (i.e., work performance) for mediation to be shown.…”
Section: H2: Technical Performance Positively Predicts Work Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In audit literature, previous studies describe the TA structure as a transactional base search process that follows a bottom-up, linear thinking style to form a mental model about the client"s system (Koonce et al, 1993;Libby & Luft, 1993;Choy & King, 2005). The mental model is constructed through a "detail-type" cognitive thinking style structure that begins by diagnosing the problem that appears in the transactional level and goes on to search for a possible cause for these problems.…”
Section: Mental Model For Tamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other factors identified as also influencing professional judgement are: the degree of audit firm structure (McDaniel, 1990), audit firm procedures ( (Morris & Nichols, 1988); the existence of decision aids (Ashton, 1990); inputs from specialists or colleagues (Libby & Luft, 1993); nature and quality of feedback available (Ashton, 1991) and the nature of the task itself (Abdolmohammadi & Wright, 1987). In addition, the professional judgement process is affected by facts and data, the people involved; the standards, rules and procedures (Gibbins & Mason, 1988).…”
Section: The Use Of Professional Judgement May Become Even More Impormentioning
confidence: 99%