Determinants of HIV outpatient service utilization according to HIV parameters

Abstract

IntroductionThe increased life expectancy of HIV patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy has had profound consequences for the healthcare systems that provide their care. It is useful to assess whether healthcare resources need to be adapted to the different stages of HIV infection or to patient characteristics [1]. To study how patient features influence utilization of out patient services, we retrospectively analyzed the electronic health record of HIV-positive patients who had followed day-care programs at the AIDS Center of the University of Palermo, Italy.Materials and Methods223 HIV-infected subjects were recruited and divided into two groups according to CD4 cell counts (117 with a CD4 count ≤500/mm3 and 106 with CD4 count ≥500/mm3). Data on age, gender, race, lifestyle habits (including educational level, drug abuse history, smoking status, alcohol consumption, sexual behaviour) BMI, HIV-RNA, CD4+ T-cell count, antiretroviral therapy (ART), comorbidities such as HCV co-infection, osteoporosis biomarker, dyslipidemia, diabetes, renal function and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were recorded in a purposely designed database and were analyzed in relation to AIN by uni- and multivariable logistic regression.ResultsTable 1 shows the characteristics of enrolled patients; the average age of the recruited patients was 45.4±9.5 years. 163 individuals were male (73%), 26 were immigrants (12%) and 91 (40%) were treatment-naïve. Mean day care access for laboratory tests to evaluate stage of HIV and for treatment monitoring was 6.5 days for CD4 cell count measurements and 9.6 for HIV RNA/drug-resistance testing. When patients were stratified according to CD4 count, mean day care access for laboratory tests to evaluate HIV stage and to monitor treatment was negatively correlated with CD4 cell counts. ConclusionsOnly patients with CD4 counts ≤500/mm3 showed higher rates of healthcare utilization; these data may be useful for monitoring and revising implementation plans for the different phases of HIV disease.

Nine ideas to improve the clinical management of HIV infected patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Hiv-outpatients service should be “patients-centered”, offering clinical answers to patient both for hiv related issues and non-hiv complications resulting from art, co-infections and/or aging, as well as prep and post-exposure prophylaxis (pep) [ 16 , 17 ]. Scheduled follow-up visits with the possibility of specialists’consultation other than infectious diseases specialists (namely: pulmonologist, gastroenterologist, cardiologist, gynecologist, gerontologist, immunologist, psycologist, psychiatric, hospital pharmacist, cultural mediator as well as peer-patients meetings) can improve patients retention to care, creating an unique environment to pursue the goal of hiv-care.…”

Aging with HIV-1 Infection: Motor Functions, Cognition, and Attention – A Comparison with Parkinson’s Disease

“…Today, HIV is no longer a terminal illness due to the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which has allowed individuals with HIV to regain near average life expectancy (Crum et al 2006; Di Carlo et al 2014; Hunt 2014; van Sighem et al 2010). It is projected that by 2015, more than 50 % of individuals infected with HIV will have reached the age of 50 (Greene et al 2013).…”