1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1996)8:1<21::aid-ajhb2>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of growth in body length from birth to 6 years of age: A longitudinal study of Lublin children

Abstract: The effect of determinants of growth in body length from birth to 6 years of age were studied in a longitudinal sample of 59 male and 70 female infants from Lublin, Poland. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to study the effects of gender of the child, occupation of the parents, the educational level of the parents, per capita income, the stature of the parents, and the weight of the mother on body length at birth and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 years of age. Significant sex differences in length were observed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Errors in the relationship between diaphyseal lengths and gestational age are well known, but difficult to control for in archaeological populations. In addition to factors pertaining directly to the mother, such as ethnic group, age, height, and parity, external factors such as season, social class, and pollutants have all been shown to affect the size and weight of the infant at birth (Adair, 2004;Hauspie et al, 1994). It has also been proposed that female fetuses mature earlier than do males in terms of both leg length and weight (Lampl and Jeanty, 2003), potentially resulting in longer diaphyseal lengths, and hence, older age estimates in female dominated samples.…”
Section: Estimating Age-at-deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in the relationship between diaphyseal lengths and gestational age are well known, but difficult to control for in archaeological populations. In addition to factors pertaining directly to the mother, such as ethnic group, age, height, and parity, external factors such as season, social class, and pollutants have all been shown to affect the size and weight of the infant at birth (Adair, 2004;Hauspie et al, 1994). It has also been proposed that female fetuses mature earlier than do males in terms of both leg length and weight (Lampl and Jeanty, 2003), potentially resulting in longer diaphyseal lengths, and hence, older age estimates in female dominated samples.…”
Section: Estimating Age-at-deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with archeological context, other excavated remains, and mortuary practices, such age‐at‐death estimations, provide information about the stage of individual infant growth and how people in ancient societies defined when a newborn became an infant. Although gender and maternal factors influence the size of infant bones (Hauspie et al, 1996), it remains the most prevalent method for estimating infant age (Booth et al, 2016; Booth & Madgwick, 2016; Cruz & Codinha, 2009; Piga et al, 2015; Zhou, Zhang, Garvie‐Lok, Gu, & Wang, 2020; Zhou, Zhang, Garvie‐Lok, Gu, & Xin, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of Polish infants (Hauspie et al, 1996) indicates that the body size of children at birth, that is, the outcome of prenatal growth, is largely controlled by intrauterine factors, reflected by maternal physical rather than genetic factors (no relation with father's stature).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%