2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of fracture type in the proximal femur: Biomechanical study of fresh frozen cadavers and finite element models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike hip fractures, which are characterized by the immediate disappearance of mobility and urgent need for hospitalization and surgery 16 , many vertebral fractures are asymptomatic and affect a larger number of people. In addition, the hip is prone to fracture due to lateral external force 46 , while the vertebral body is vulnerable to both longitudinal and lateral external forces. This also explains why falls account for the majority cause of hip fractures 47 while only responsible for a quarter of vertebral fractures 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike hip fractures, which are characterized by the immediate disappearance of mobility and urgent need for hospitalization and surgery 16 , many vertebral fractures are asymptomatic and affect a larger number of people. In addition, the hip is prone to fracture due to lateral external force 46 , while the vertebral body is vulnerable to both longitudinal and lateral external forces. This also explains why falls account for the majority cause of hip fractures 47 while only responsible for a quarter of vertebral fractures 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric morphometry is the most direct and important criterion in the comparative study of bone structure. The diaphyseal cross-sectional properties, on which we focus here, are the following geometric parameters: (1) Section modulus ( Z ), which is approximately proportional to the bending or torsional moment that characterizes the cross-sectional strength of the bone [ 15 ], is a good indicator of a bone’s cross-sectional mechanical performance; (2) cortical thickness ratio (CTR, the dorsal cortical thickness/the plantar cortical thickness), which represents asymmetry of the cortical bone distribution between dorsal and plantar surfaces as well as a more defined direction of greatest bending rigidity; (3) the ratio of principal moments of area (Imax/Imin), which is an estimation of cross-sectional shape and bending rigidity; the larger the cross-sectional Imax/Imin ratio deviates from one, the greater the departure from circularity; and (4) percent cortical bone area (%CA, cortical area [CA]/total cross-sectional area), which provides an estimate of axial compressive or tensile strength. Calcaneal diaphyseal cross-sectional properties were measured at the MS (means of 40% and 50% locations) and DS locations (means of 20% and 30% locations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric morphometry is the most direct and important criterion in the comparative study of bone structure. The diaphyseal cross-sectional properties, on which we focus here, are the following geometric parameters: (1) Section modulus (Z), which is approximately proportional to the bending or torsional moment that characterizes the cross-sectional strength of the bone [15], is a good indicator of a bone's cross-sectional mechanical performance;…”
Section: Micro-ct Scanning Of the Bonementioning
confidence: 99%