2019
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1676779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Fertility Rates in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variables could have different integration of orders i.e., I(0), I(1) or mixed (Peasaran and Shin, 1998). Besides, the sample size is relatively small in this study (Ozbay Das, 2020) and Narayan (2006) pointed out that "with the ARDL framework, the OLS estimators of the short-run parameters are consistent and the ARDL based estimators of the long-run coefficients are superconsistent in small sample sizes " (2006, p.400).…”
Section: Empirical Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The variables could have different integration of orders i.e., I(0), I(1) or mixed (Peasaran and Shin, 1998). Besides, the sample size is relatively small in this study (Ozbay Das, 2020) and Narayan (2006) pointed out that "with the ARDL framework, the OLS estimators of the short-run parameters are consistent and the ARDL based estimators of the long-run coefficients are superconsistent in small sample sizes " (2006, p.400).…”
Section: Empirical Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Though this seems counter-intuitive to some earlier reports and research findings, [21][22][23][24] our findings could be attributed to a number of factors. As espoused by some scholars, 25,26 fertility is a resultant outcome of an interplay of several factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%