2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Farmers’ Land Use Decision-Making: Comparative Evidence From Thailand and Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
77
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving a sustainable livelihood will increase a household's ability to manage stress, as well as maintain and enhance a household's capabilities and capital without destroying natural resources [12]. The different forms of livelihood capital include natural capital (e.g., land), physical capital (e.g., durable goods), human capital (e.g., household size), financial capital (e.g., deposit), and social capital (communication cost), which are widely used in previous research [13,14]. The sustainable livelihood analysis framework developed by the UK's International Development Agency endeavors to establish the logical relationship and interaction mechanism among livelihood capital, livelihood activities, and livelihood consequences [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving a sustainable livelihood will increase a household's ability to manage stress, as well as maintain and enhance a household's capabilities and capital without destroying natural resources [12]. The different forms of livelihood capital include natural capital (e.g., land), physical capital (e.g., durable goods), human capital (e.g., household size), financial capital (e.g., deposit), and social capital (communication cost), which are widely used in previous research [13,14]. The sustainable livelihood analysis framework developed by the UK's International Development Agency endeavors to establish the logical relationship and interaction mechanism among livelihood capital, livelihood activities, and livelihood consequences [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review assesses different credit schemes applied in different geographical [29][30][31][32][33][34], and historical contexts [35][36][37][38], to analyse the range of options available to farmers. Literature of the past 10 years was reviewed, featuring a wide range of financial schemes including public and private credit, formal and informal schemes, credit for farmers and credit for the poor, microfinance and different inclusive models for agricultural development.…”
Section: A Review Of Credit Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then assume that, in the pre-shock period , households are characterised by a series of strategic assets = { , , , }, where stands for natural capital, denotes human capital, and , are vectors of financial and social assets, respectively (Scoones, 1998;Bebbington, 1999;Ellis, 2000;Niehof, 2004;Martin and Lorenzen, 2016;Asfaw, Pallante and Palma, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2017). During the pre-shock period, the resilience is expected to be at the minimum level given that households have not experienced any shocks, although they may be aware of future occurrence of potential extreme events.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework 21 Climate Adaptation Practices In Devmentioning
confidence: 99%