2019
DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1516388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of corruption in China: a policy perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, this combination can enhance public governance by ‘increasing public access to information, empowering civil society to oversee the state, enabling citizens to track government decisions and actions of public employees, and substantially reducing the costs of transparency efforts’ (Nam, 2018, p. 275). As such, e‐government, or the use of information and communication technologies to enhance government openness (Hameduddin, Fernandez, & Demircioglu, 2020) and transparency, is expected to play a substantial role in tackling corruption (Saleem, Wen, & Khan, 2019). In other words, insofar as public sector innovation is understood as ‘the implementation of a product, process, practice, technology, or service that is new to the adopting organization’ (Wegrich, 2019, p. 12; see also Osborne & Brown, 2005), what we see here is the epitome of public sector innovation endeavouring to combat corruption.…”
Section: Background and Literature Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, this combination can enhance public governance by ‘increasing public access to information, empowering civil society to oversee the state, enabling citizens to track government decisions and actions of public employees, and substantially reducing the costs of transparency efforts’ (Nam, 2018, p. 275). As such, e‐government, or the use of information and communication technologies to enhance government openness (Hameduddin, Fernandez, & Demircioglu, 2020) and transparency, is expected to play a substantial role in tackling corruption (Saleem, Wen, & Khan, 2019). In other words, insofar as public sector innovation is understood as ‘the implementation of a product, process, practice, technology, or service that is new to the adopting organization’ (Wegrich, 2019, p. 12; see also Osborne & Brown, 2005), what we see here is the epitome of public sector innovation endeavouring to combat corruption.…”
Section: Background and Literature Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, this combination can enhance public governance by 'increasing public access to information, empowering civil society to oversee the state, enabling citizens to track government decisions and actions of public employees, and substantially reducing the costs of transparency efforts' (Nam, 2018, p. 275). As such, e-government, or the use of information and communication technologies to enhance government openness (Hameduddin, Fernandez, & Demircioglu, 2020) and transparency, is expected to play a substantial role in tackling corruption (Saleem, Wen, & Khan, 2019).…”
Section: Background and Literature Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies that analyse anti‐corruption policies and technologies, the adoption of e‐government and associated technologies are determining factors of effective anti‐corruption strategies (Everett et al, 2007; Neupane et al, 2014; Sommersguter‐Reichmann et al, 2018; Zhang & Zhang, 2009). In particular, some innovative technologies support the development of policies, internal control processes and internal and external reporting of crimes to prevent corruption and generate an index of transparency, trust, efficiency, reduced red tape and real‐time reporting (Adam & Fazekas, 2021; Chege & Wang, 2020; Saleem et al, 2020). E‐procurement, e‐service tax, forensic tools, mobile applications, big data mining control and multiagency collaboration are among the automation technologies (Chege & Wang, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%