2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1684240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity in South America: Do Institutional Quality and Financial Development Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, banking concentration and the quality of the financial system have been weighted as fundamental within heterogeneous legal frameworks, as in the Latin American case (Gonzales and Gonzales, 2008), where -in addition to institutional quality -significant variables are considered in its relationship with corporate debt (Kirch and Soares, 2012). It is even possible to determine which specific institutional forces such as government quality, rule of law or financial development are directly linked (Fan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, banking concentration and the quality of the financial system have been weighted as fundamental within heterogeneous legal frameworks, as in the Latin American case (Gonzales and Gonzales, 2008), where -in addition to institutional quality -significant variables are considered in its relationship with corporate debt (Kirch and Soares, 2012). It is even possible to determine which specific institutional forces such as government quality, rule of law or financial development are directly linked (Fan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between variables resulting from business performance and the maturity of debt is explicit throughout the previous literature; however, on the aggregate elements in terms of country, there is a recent research that states, for example, that an effective legal system encourages long-term investments (Demirguc-Kunt and Maksimovic, 1999;Nasr et al, 2015;Alves and Francisco, 2015). These authors argue that it is feasible for businesses to engage credibly with banking, controlling the opportunistic behavior of corporate information, so much so that the factors of institutional quality, banking development, volatility of the reference rate and volatility of inflation (Kirch and Soares, 2012) are considered as macro-financial variables. In contrast, Fan et al (2012) consider that in a country with a weak legal system and a low-level of institutional quality, the financial system should make to prevailing products that allow the creditor to have less discretion and easier interpretation.…”
Section: Determinants Of Maturity Of Debtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tax and liquidity risk hypotheses, on the other hand, receive somewhat greater support in these studies. Kirch, Renato, and Terra (2012) focus on five South American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and Venezuela) and report results that lend partial support for each of the four major groups of debt maturity hypotheses. Most closely related to ours is perhaps the study by Arslan and Karan (2006) who, like us, focus on Turkey.…”
Section: Large Publicly-traded Firm Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that tangible assets play a more important role than intangible assets in reducing the risk of default as they suffer a smaller loss of value when a firm goes into distress (see, for example, Köksal and Orman, 2015). In addition, tangible assets are easier to collateralize and collateral, in turn, might have a more relevant role (in reducing risk) in long-term lending than in short-term lending (Kirch, Renato, and Terra, 2012). Finally, if firms match the maturities of assets and liabilities, tangible assets should be better able to support long-term debt as they are more lasting than intangible assets (Stohs and Mauer, 1996).…”
Section: Tangibility and Profitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bae and Goyal (2009) show banks reduce loan maturities in countries with less efficient contract enforcement. Focusing on firm-level data from five Latin American countries Kirch and Soares Terra (2012) find that the institutional quality of a country has a significant positive effect on the level of long-term debt in a firm's financial structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%