2001
DOI: 10.2307/3146941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Cleaner Technology Investments in the U.S. Bleached Kraft Pulp Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purvis et al [63] try to simulate the investment behaviour in the presence of uncertainty and irreversibility, an approach also pursued by Diederen et al [16]. Luque [52] tries to incorporate elements of the option theory in a probit analysis of the determinants of investment, while Maynard and Shortle [54] find a double hurdle approach superior to the probit approach.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Diffusion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purvis et al [63] try to simulate the investment behaviour in the presence of uncertainty and irreversibility, an approach also pursued by Diederen et al [16]. Luque [52] tries to incorporate elements of the option theory in a probit analysis of the determinants of investment, while Maynard and Shortle [54] find a double hurdle approach superior to the probit approach.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Diffusion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trade groups have been shown to influence marinas to undertake best environmental practices (May, 2003). And bleached Kraft pulp producers that are members of environmental groups are more likely to use cleaner technologies than nonmembers (Maynard & Shortle, 2001). In these examples, the associations serve as mediating institutions by influencing their members to behave in socially desirable ways.…”
Section: Association Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid such problems and at the same time account for the importance of fuel price variation to firms, a variable was created to capture a firm's fuel intensity (instead of the price of fuel): the ratio between fuel use and revenues. Maynard and Shortle (2001) include an energy intensity variable to determine the adoption of abatement technology and find that this variable has a positive and significant impact on abatement investments. Hence, firms with high energy (or fuel) intensity have more incentives to reduce their energy dependency than firms with low energy (fuel) intensity.…”
Section: Fuel Use and Pricementioning
confidence: 99%