2022
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women with access to free screening: A community‐based study in peri‐urban Ghana

Abstract: Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality globally. 1 The impact of cervical cancer is especially devastating in low-and middle-income countries. Sub-Saharan Africa contributes more than 85% of the global burden of cervical cancer, with an annual incidence of 34.8 per 100 000 women and mortality of 22.5 per 100 000 women. 2,3 In Ghana, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women, with more than 3000 new cases and 2000 deaths annually. 4 Ghanaian women have nearly thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the finding of this study, women who were employed in government organizations were 8.09 times more likely to uptake CC screening services. This report is in agreement with the finding of studies conducted in Latin America, Ghana, and Gomma district, South West Ethiopia ( Gizaw et al, 2022 ; Soneji & Fukui, 2013 ; Tawiah et al, 2022 ). This finding is widely linked to women's financial constraints to screening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to the finding of this study, women who were employed in government organizations were 8.09 times more likely to uptake CC screening services. This report is in agreement with the finding of studies conducted in Latin America, Ghana, and Gomma district, South West Ethiopia ( Gizaw et al, 2022 ; Soneji & Fukui, 2013 ; Tawiah et al, 2022 ). This finding is widely linked to women's financial constraints to screening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ten explanatory variables were used in agreement with both theoretical and empirical literature [ 3 , 19 , 20 ]. The explanatory variables include: place of residence (urban = 1, rural = 2); level of education (No education = 0, primary = 1, secondary = 2, higher = 3); wealth index (poorest = 1, poorer = 2, middle = 3, richer = 4, richest = 5); women’s age (15–19 = 1, 20–24 = 2, 25–29 = 3, 30–34 = 4, 35–39 = 5, 40–44 = 6, 45–49 = 7); contraceptive use (not using = 0, using = 1); frequency of reading newspaper or magazine (not at all = 0, less than once a week = 1, at least once a week = 2); frequency of listening to radio (not at all = 0, less than once a week = 1, at least once a week = 2); frequency of watching television (not at all = 0, less than once a week = 1, at least once a week = 2); Had any sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the last 12 months (no = 0, yes = 1); and Country variable (Benin = 1, Cote d’Ivoire = 2, Cameroon = 3, Kenya = 4, Namibia = 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar low screening rates were reported by a study among women in Kenya where only 35.6% of the eligible women were screened [ 13 ]. Among Ghanaian women, only 24.6% of those eligible were screened despite the close proximity to facilities offering free cervical cancer screening services [ 14 ]. This low screening rate is an indication of the existence of barriers to screening uptake, which remain unaddressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%