Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundSarcopenia and low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) are prevalent musculoskeletal complications after paediatric cancer treatment. However, their relationship has not been examined in young paediatric cancers survivors. This study aimed to evaluate aBMD differences according to sarcopenia status and the risk of low aBMD Z‐score in young paediatric cancer survivors with sarcopenia confirmed/probable.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study included 116 paediatric cancer survivors (12.1 ± 3.3 years old; 42.2% female). Handgrip strength was used to assessed muscle strength. Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry estimated aBMD (g/cm2) and appendicular lean mass index (ALMI, kg/m2). ‘No sarcopenia’ was defined when muscle strength was >decile 2. ‘Sarcopenia probable’ was defined when muscle strength was ≤ decile 2 and ALMI Z‐score was > −1.5 standard deviation (SD). ‘Sarcopenia confirmed’ was defined when muscle strength was ≤ decile 2 and ALMI Z‐score ≤ −1.5 SD. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression, adjusted for time from treatment completion, radiotherapy exposure, calcium intake, and physical activity, was used to evaluate aBMD and estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of low aBMD (aBMD Z‐score < −1.0).ResultsSurvivors with sarcopenia confirmed had significantly lower aBMD than those without sarcopenia at total body (−1.2 [95% CI: −1.5 to −0.8] vs. 0.2 [−0.2 to 0.6], P < 0.001), lumbar spine (−0.7 [−1.1 to −0.3] vs. 0.4 [0.0 to 0.8], P < 0.001), total hip (−0.5 [−0.9 to −0.2] vs. 0.4 [0.1 to 0.8], P < 0.001), and femoral neck (−1.0 [−1.4 to −0.6] vs. 0.1 [−0.3 to 0.4], P = 0.001). Compared with survivors with sarcopenia probable, survivors with sarcopenia confirmed had significantly lower aBMD Z‐score at total body (−1.2 [−1.5 to −0.8] vs. −0.2 [−0.7 to 0.4], P = 0.009), total hip (−0.5 [−0.9 to −0.2] vs. 0.5 [−0.1 to 1.0], P = 0.010), and femoral neck (−1.0 [−1.4 to −0.6] vs. 0.1 [−0.5 to 0.7], P = 0.014). Survivors with sarcopenia confirmed were at higher risk of low aBMD Z‐score at the total body (OR: 6.91, 95% CI: 2.31–24.15), total hip (OR: 2.98, 1.02–9.54), and femoral neck (OR: 4.72, 1.72–14.19), than those without sarcopenia. Survivors with sarcopenia probable were at higher risk of low aBMD Z‐score at the total body (OR: 4.13, 1.04–17.60) than those without sarcopenia.ConclusionsYoung paediatric cancer survivors with sarcopenia present higher risk of low aBMD. Resistance training‐based interventions designed to mitigate osteosarcopenia in this population should be implemented at early stages.
BackgroundSarcopenia and low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) are prevalent musculoskeletal complications after paediatric cancer treatment. However, their relationship has not been examined in young paediatric cancers survivors. This study aimed to evaluate aBMD differences according to sarcopenia status and the risk of low aBMD Z‐score in young paediatric cancer survivors with sarcopenia confirmed/probable.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study included 116 paediatric cancer survivors (12.1 ± 3.3 years old; 42.2% female). Handgrip strength was used to assessed muscle strength. Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry estimated aBMD (g/cm2) and appendicular lean mass index (ALMI, kg/m2). ‘No sarcopenia’ was defined when muscle strength was >decile 2. ‘Sarcopenia probable’ was defined when muscle strength was ≤ decile 2 and ALMI Z‐score was > −1.5 standard deviation (SD). ‘Sarcopenia confirmed’ was defined when muscle strength was ≤ decile 2 and ALMI Z‐score ≤ −1.5 SD. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression, adjusted for time from treatment completion, radiotherapy exposure, calcium intake, and physical activity, was used to evaluate aBMD and estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of low aBMD (aBMD Z‐score < −1.0).ResultsSurvivors with sarcopenia confirmed had significantly lower aBMD than those without sarcopenia at total body (−1.2 [95% CI: −1.5 to −0.8] vs. 0.2 [−0.2 to 0.6], P < 0.001), lumbar spine (−0.7 [−1.1 to −0.3] vs. 0.4 [0.0 to 0.8], P < 0.001), total hip (−0.5 [−0.9 to −0.2] vs. 0.4 [0.1 to 0.8], P < 0.001), and femoral neck (−1.0 [−1.4 to −0.6] vs. 0.1 [−0.3 to 0.4], P = 0.001). Compared with survivors with sarcopenia probable, survivors with sarcopenia confirmed had significantly lower aBMD Z‐score at total body (−1.2 [−1.5 to −0.8] vs. −0.2 [−0.7 to 0.4], P = 0.009), total hip (−0.5 [−0.9 to −0.2] vs. 0.5 [−0.1 to 1.0], P = 0.010), and femoral neck (−1.0 [−1.4 to −0.6] vs. 0.1 [−0.5 to 0.7], P = 0.014). Survivors with sarcopenia confirmed were at higher risk of low aBMD Z‐score at the total body (OR: 6.91, 95% CI: 2.31–24.15), total hip (OR: 2.98, 1.02–9.54), and femoral neck (OR: 4.72, 1.72–14.19), than those without sarcopenia. Survivors with sarcopenia probable were at higher risk of low aBMD Z‐score at the total body (OR: 4.13, 1.04–17.60) than those without sarcopenia.ConclusionsYoung paediatric cancer survivors with sarcopenia present higher risk of low aBMD. Resistance training‐based interventions designed to mitigate osteosarcopenia in this population should be implemented at early stages.
No abstract
Purpose We aimed to examine the associations of 24-hour movement behaviors (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], light physical activity [LPA], sedentary behavior [SB] and sleep) with age-, sex- and race-specific areal bone mineral density (aBMD) Z-score parameters at clinical sites in young pediatric cancer survivors. Methods This cross-sectional multicenter study was carried out within the iBoneFIT framework in which 116 young pediatric cancer survivors (12.1 ± 3.3 years old; 42% female) were recruited. We obtained anthropometric and body composition data (i.e., body mass, stature, body mass index and region-specific lean mass), time spent in movement behaviors over at least seven consecutive 24-hour periods (wGT3x-BT accelerometer, ActiGraph) and aBMD Z-score parameters (age-, sex- and race-specific total at the body, total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine). Survivors were classified according to somatic maturity (pre or peri/post-pubertal depending on the estimated years from peak height velocity). The adjusted models’ coefficients were used to predict the effect of reallocating time proportionally across behaviors on the outcomes. Results In pre-pubertal young pediatric cancer survivors, reallocating time to MVPA from LPA, SB and sleep was significantly associated with higher aBMD at total body (B = 1.765, P = .005), total hip (B = 1.709, P = .003) and lumbar spine (B = 2.093, P = .001). In peri/post-pubertal survivors, reallocating time to LPA from MVPA, SB and sleep was significantly associated with higher aBMD at all sites (B = 2.090 to 2.609, P = .003 to .038). Reallocating time to SB from MVPA or LPA was significantly associated with lower aBMD at most sites in pre-pubertal and peri/post-pubertal survivors, respectively. Finally, reallocating time to sleep from MVPA, LPA and SB was significantly associated with lower aBMD at total body (B = -2.572, P = .036) and total hip (B = -3.371, P = .015). Conclusions These findings suggest that every move counts and underline the benefits of increasing MVPA or LPA, when low MVPA levels are present, for bone regeneration following pediatric cancer treatment completion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.