2022
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: Population-Based Longitudinal Study (COVIDENCE UK)

Abstract: Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines vary for reasons that remain poorly understood. A range of sociodemographic, behavioural, clinical, pharmacologic and nutritional factors could explain these differences. To investigate this hypothesis, we tested for presence of combined IgG, IgA and IgM (IgGAM) anti-Spike antibodies before and after 2 doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (ChAdOx1, AstraZeneca) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in UK adults participating in a population-based longitudinal study who received their firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
5

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
34
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After a mean number of 96 days (range 14–180) from third vaccine dose, all MGUS patients (100%) achieved a titer greater than 50 AU/mL; thus, they were all considered as “responders”. Notably, in contrast with previously reported data, 10 administration of the first two doses of ChAdOx1 was not associated to lower antibody titer compared to that after two BNT162b2 doses. We did not find any correlation between gender (p-value=0.1768), MGUS-subtype (p-value=0.1956), MGUS risk-stratification (p-value=0.1647), sequence of vaccine doses (p-value=0.4144), days from third vaccine dose to blood collection (p-value=0.3347) and titer of anti-spike IgG antibodies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a mean number of 96 days (range 14–180) from third vaccine dose, all MGUS patients (100%) achieved a titer greater than 50 AU/mL; thus, they were all considered as “responders”. Notably, in contrast with previously reported data, 10 administration of the first two doses of ChAdOx1 was not associated to lower antibody titer compared to that after two BNT162b2 doses. We did not find any correlation between gender (p-value=0.1768), MGUS-subtype (p-value=0.1956), MGUS risk-stratification (p-value=0.1647), sequence of vaccine doses (p-value=0.4144), days from third vaccine dose to blood collection (p-value=0.3347) and titer of anti-spike IgG antibodies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…After a mean number of 96 days (range 14-180) from third vaccine dose, all MGUS patients (100%) achieved a titer greater than 50 AU/mL; thus, they were all considered as "responders". Notably, in contrast with previously reported data, 10 administration of the first two doses of ChAdOx1 was not associated to lower Then we compared serological response of MGUS patients with those of age and sex matched healthcare workers, enrolled in the study as HCs. It was possible only for 11 patients; the remaining nine ones were older than HCs and therefore not comparable with healthcare workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A further strength is the use of an ELISA with high sensitivity and specificity that targets three different types of antibody (IgG/IgA/IgM), increasing the probability of identifying a past infection over other studies which primarily use quantitative levels of IgG anti-spike antibodies 16 . Additionally, we used dried blood spots for our sampling: although these yield a low volume of sample and their results may be impacted by variations in haematocrit, their use has been found to significantly reduce processing failures compared with microtubes 17 , which are currently used by large seroprevalence surveys 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was nested within COVIDENCE UK, which is a prospective longitudinal population-based observational study of coronavirus disease in the UK population ( www.qmul.ac.uk/covidence ) 16 , 17 , 19 . The study was launched on 1 st May 2020, and closed to enrolment on 6 th October 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is currently limited evidence on factors influencing individual responses to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. A wide range of sociodemographic, biological, clinical, and nutritional factors have been reported to influence the different production of anti-spike antibodies and their titers after vaccination in people of different ages and ethnicities [ 17 ]. Therefore, individual genetic background, which influences the intensity and quality of the immune and inflammatory response, could also be implicated in the regulation of the vaccine-induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%