2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01520-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of access to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a preliminary approach

Abstract: Background The determinants of access to immunizers are still poorly understood, leading to questions about which criteria were considered in this distribution. Given the above, the present study aimed to analyze the determinants of access to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine by different countries. Methods The study covered 189 countries using data from different public databases, and collected until February 19, 2021. We used eight explanatory variables: gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Covariates: We considered COVID-19 morbidity (COVID-19 infection cases per million population) and mortality rates (COVID-19 linked deaths per million population) as of December 2021 for each country, adopted from the Economist Intelligence Unit [ 44 ]. In addition, we included socioeconomic and political determinants that are known to predict the access to vaccines or actual vaccination rate of nations [ 45 ]: total population, population density, and GDP per capita adopted from Mathieu et al [ 6 ], literacy adopted from Roser and Ortiz-Ospina [ 46 ], democracy index (each country’s scores for electoral process and pluralism, functioning of government, political participation, democratic political culture and civil liberties: 1 = authoritarian regime, 2 = hybrid regime, 3 = flawed democracy, 4 = full democracy) adopted from the Economist Intelligence Unit [ 44 ], and institutional quality (voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence/terrorism, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption indices; lowest score = −3.00, highest score = 3.00), and human development index (composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which are used to rank countries into four tiers of human development: 1.0–0.8 = very high, 0.79–0.70 = high, 0.70–0.55 = medium, below 0.55 = low) adopted from Kaufmann and Kraay [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariates: We considered COVID-19 morbidity (COVID-19 infection cases per million population) and mortality rates (COVID-19 linked deaths per million population) as of December 2021 for each country, adopted from the Economist Intelligence Unit [ 44 ]. In addition, we included socioeconomic and political determinants that are known to predict the access to vaccines or actual vaccination rate of nations [ 45 ]: total population, population density, and GDP per capita adopted from Mathieu et al [ 6 ], literacy adopted from Roser and Ortiz-Ospina [ 46 ], democracy index (each country’s scores for electoral process and pluralism, functioning of government, political participation, democratic political culture and civil liberties: 1 = authoritarian regime, 2 = hybrid regime, 3 = flawed democracy, 4 = full democracy) adopted from the Economist Intelligence Unit [ 44 ], and institutional quality (voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence/terrorism, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption indices; lowest score = −3.00, highest score = 3.00), and human development index (composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which are used to rank countries into four tiers of human development: 1.0–0.8 = very high, 0.79–0.70 = high, 0.70–0.55 = medium, below 0.55 = low) adopted from Kaufmann and Kraay [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current pandemic situation is ongoing and a continuous threat to public health, and still, no anti- SARS-CoV-2 drugs or vaccine options have shown absolute health benefits ( Singh et al., 2020a ; Singh et al., 2020b ). SARS-CoV-2 is very challenging due to age factors, gender differences, ecological factors, and its quick evolution ( de Oliveira et al., 2021 ). The investigations from various fields to come up with effective treatment options and vaccine developments are shown in Figure 2 ( Marian et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Vaccine and Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we cannot exclude the necessity of repeated lock-down strategies, especially considering SARS-CoV-2 variants [ 55 ]. Finally, we are experiencing dramatic differences in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign when high-income and low-income countries are compared [ 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently, the availability of vaccines and the activation of programs for extensive vaccination contribute to an improvement of the health and social situation [ 13 16 ], but we expect that the difficulty in organizing teaching activities will persist. In this respect, we are experiencing dramatic differences in tackling SARS-CoV-2 (for instance with the vaccination campaign), due to the relevant heterogeneity between high-income and low-income countries [ 17 19 ]. Therefore, some countries will not be able to solve in short time the teaching difficulties, due to persistence of high levels of SARS-CoV-2 spreading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%