Determinants of a high-quality consultation in medical communications: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence

Abstract

Purpose The medical consultation is one of the requirements in diseases diagnosis and patient treatment. In addition, a high-quality consultation is a fundamental demand of patients, and it is one of the rights of every patient. The purpose of this paper is to identify factors affecting the high-quality consultation in medical communications. Design/methodology/approach The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus and ProQuest until December 2018. In addition, the authors searched Google Scholar. Qualitative and quantitative studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Qualitative Checklist and the Center for Evidence-Based Management appraisal checklist, respectively. A stepwise approach was conducted for data synthesis. Findings Of 3,826 identified studies, 29 met the full inclusion criteria. Overall, after quality assessment of studies, 25 studies were included. The studies were conducted in the USA (n=6), the UK (n=6), the Netherlands (n=4), Canada (n=2), Belgium (n=2), Poland (n=2), Germany (n=1), Iran (n=1), Finland (n=1), Austria (n=1), Qatar (n=1), Denmark (n=1) and China (n=1), and five studies were excluded. Data synthesis showed that high-quality consultation consisted of three main categories: structural (4 main themes with 26 sub-themes), process (2 main themes with 33 sub-themes) and outcome (3 main themes with 12 sub-themes) quality. Originality/value Using the indicators of consultation quality improvement can develop physicians’ clinical competence and skills. Decision makers can use them to monitor and evaluate physicians’ performance. A high-quality consultation can be useful in social prescribing that helps patients to manage their disease.

A systematic review of the relationships between nurse leaders' leadership styles and nurses' work‐related well‐being

“…It included 12 criteria (Table 2). The checklist did not include any guidance regarding rating the quality of the studies; therefore, the authors decided together the scale of ranking (Baatiema et al, 2017; Bahadori et al, 2020; Protogerou & Hagger, 2019). The researchers decided that if the study met over half of the criteria (7/12), it was accepted for the review.…”

Doctor Attributes That Patients Desire during Consultation: The Perspectives of Doctors and Patients in Primary Health Care in Botswana

“…The doctor–patient relationship provides the primary means for the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Thus, a good doctor–patient relationship and high-quality consultation increase patients’ willingness to reveal information, describe symptoms, adhere to a treatment plan, and achieve desired health outcomes [ 12 , 13 ]. Therefore, it is important for doctors to recognise when the relationship is challenged as well as the factors contributing to the poor interactions, in order to improve care [ 9 ].…”

“…Patients base their assessment of a consultation on the doctor’s qualities and attributes, which influence the outcome and quality of the consultation [ 12 ]. Doctors’ attributes and interaction with patients during consultation affect the health outcome, adherence to treatment, and health-seeking behaviours of patients [ 14 , 15 ].…”

Physician’s perception of E-consultation adoption amid of COVID-19 pandemic

“…This innovative digital mode of consultation not only helped physicians to give 24 × 7 uninterrupted advice from their location with limited use of personal protection equipment but also reduced the chance of delayed patient care (Owusu Kwateng et al , 2021). The extension of this e-consultation to the patients by the use of Web 2.0 with their devices such as a smartphone, laptop, tablets or personal computers saves patients from various morbid conditions, travel time, waiting time in the physicians’ clinic or the hospital and more to it the overall cost of the treatment (Alam et al , 2020; Aiyegbajeje and Ajayi, 2018; Bahadori et al , 2019). India is a nation of resource scarcity in the health-care segment (Chellaiyan et al , 2019); proactively it embraces e-consultations and made it available to physicians and patients to tackle the pandemic situation.…”